| |
ZL3AI > WIFI 03.05.07 02:23l 31 Lines 1340 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 10124-ZL3AI
Read: DK5RAS GUEST DO5MC OE3GMW
Subj: Re: Combatting the danger.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0FSG<OE7XLR<OE9XPI<DB0CZ<DB0GE<DB0LJ<
DB0RES<F5GOV<F4BWT<IW2OAZ<ZL2BAU
Sent: 070503/0019Z @:ZL2BAU.#79.NZL.OC #:45868 [Waimate] $:10124-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL2BAU.#79.NZL.OC
To : WIFI@WW
Ian G0TEZ said:
>There has been a suggestion on British TV and on British TV sugggestions
>soon become certainties, that, like mobile 'phones & passive smoking, WiFi
>Txs could seriously damage your health.
I'm not sure if you're suggesting that passive smoking is a lot of hot air,
but I know from personal experience that inhaling someone elses cigarette
smoke would cause me to get angina, in one case, quite severe.
As to mobile phones, a local ham used to (and probably still does) tell all
the whingers about a huge RF energy source spewing its output all over
the local city inhabitants, quoting the power level and grid reference (or
lat/long) of its location so they could investigate this outrage for
themselves and protest to the health authorities and demand its removal.
(It was a TV transmission tower three or four hundred feet high on a 1,000
foot high hill overlooking the city. Been there for decades.)
Another ham pointed out that cell sites are healthy for you. If you have
one close by, your own cellphone reduces its power automatically, so if
they do indeed affect brain cells, the effect will be less. Thus, in the
interests of the best health of children, cell sites should be built in the
grounds of all schools.
73, David ZL3AI.
http://www.geocities.com/zl3ai
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
