| |
PA2AGA > TCPDIG 09.07.97 10:11l 99 Lines 2894 Bytes #-10572 (0) @ EU
BID : TCP_97_35
Read: GUEST
Subj: TCP-Group Digest 97/35
Path: DB0RGB<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<DB0RWI<PI8ZAA<PI8HWB<
PI8VAD<PI8VNW
Sent: 970709/0138Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:10339 [Hoek v Holland] FBB5.15c
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : TCPDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA37819 ; Tue, 08 Jul 97 23:33:19 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.1) with SMTP
id AA00002404 ; Fri, 11 Apr 97 14:23:47 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga with SMTP
id AA00002392 ; Fri, 11 Apr 97 14:09:13 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga-1 (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.6.1) with SMTP
id AA00009348 ; Fri, 11 Apr 97 14:09:08 MET
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 97 14:04:24 MET
Message-Id: <tcp_97_35>
From: pa2aga
To: tcp_broadcast@pa2aga-1
Subject: TCP-Group Digest 97/35
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
TCP-Group Digest Fri, 11 Apr 97 Volume 97 : Issue 35
Today's Topics:
Benefits of AMPR IP ...
What Protocole traceroute use ?
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 06:33:55 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@oklahoma.net>
Subject: Benefits of AMPR IP ...
Geez, that message was completely unreadable.
Suggestion: Throw away your email editor. Go get another one! :-)
Steve
----------
From: misko@gaianet.net
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Subject: Benefits of AMPR IP ...
Date: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 5:41 PM
Hello hams and others,
Let me comment the following...
>From: brian@nothing.ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
>Subject: Benefits of AMPR IP encapsulation gateways.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 17:36:46 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
Subject: What Protocole traceroute use ?
> Traceroute relies upon ICMP replies. It is a very bad idea to have
firewalls
> blocking ICMP as a matter of course, and ICMP is almost always permitted.
Actually its pretty much essential to dump most ICMP. People also block
ICMP ping because of cracker tools like pingftp
> If traceroute is implemented by using ICMP Echo Request frames to provoke
the
> ICMP Time Exceeded replies, then this would likely pass your firewall.
I believe MS use the IP RR option.
Alan
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V97 #35
******************************
You can send your message for this bulletin
to: tcp-group@pa2aga on .AMPR.ORG-net
or: tcpaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu on BBS-net
------
NOT TO: pa2aga@pa2aga or pa2aga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu PLEASE!!
It will get posted automatically within a few days
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
