| |
PA2AGA > TCPDIG 02.12.96 06:40l 145 Lines 4520 Bytes #-10802 (0) @ EU
BID : TCP_96_252A
Read: DG7DAH GUEST
Subj: TCP-Group Digest 96/252A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0WGS<DB0RGB<DB0LAN<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<DB0TUD<
DB0NDR<PI8AWT<PI8JYL<PI8WFL<PI8MBQ<PI8VNW
Sent: 961130/2326 49231@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : TCPDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21705 ; Sat, 30 Nov 96 21:58:54 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.1) with SMTP
id AA00000376 ; Sat, 30 Nov 96 22:41:33 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga with SMTP
id AA00000361 ; Sat, 30 Nov 96 22:39:09 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga-1 (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.5.5) with SMTP
id AA00008639 ; Sat, 30 Nov 96 22:39:08 MET
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 96 22:35:57 MET
Message-Id: <tcp_96_252A>
From: pa2aga
To: tcp_broadcast@pa2aga-1
Subject: TCP-Group Digest 96/252A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
TCP-Group Digest Fri, 29 Nov 96 Volume 96 : Issue 252
Today's Topics:
??? ethrax25 ??? how ?
AEA up for sale; customer service closed
IPv6
JNETCEX
New version of JNETCEX
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 11:32:06 +0100
From: Jacques PHILIPPE <on4kjp@ibm.net>
Subject: ??? ethrax25 ??? how ?
Bill Horne wrote:
>Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 07:14:23 -0500 (EST)
>From: Bill Horne <bhorne@lynx.dac.neu.edu>
>Subject: ??? ethrax25 ??? How ?
>>
>> Steve Sampson wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Portmapper" is something entirely different, used for RPC
>negotiation.
>> > What
>> > > you are thinking of is "IP masquerading."
>> >
>> > That's fine.
>> >
>> > I didn't mean to use any copyrighted, or trade-marked terms.
>> > What's so bad about English, is that 60% of the words are owned by
>> > American capitalists :-)
>> >
>> > Steve
>>
>> That's American(tm) capitalists(tm) to you! :-)
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
>Sorry, Jim, "American" is only a servicemark, not a trademark - and
>since the Soviet Union fell, "capitalist" has fallen into common usage
>and lost trademark protection. ;-J
>
>Bill "Now known by the symbol that used to be pronounced AA1ES" Horne, W1AC
>--
>
>Bill Horne
>bhorne@lynx.neu.edu
>
>------------------------------
By the way, the subject ??? ETHRAX25 ??? HOW ? was MY 'copyright', and
this is very very far from the subject ;-)
Eight? msgs use MY subject. One was an answer to MY question.
I guess nobody remenbers it ?
Nevermind, use it for your endless chats invading all ham news groups :
save our bands, CW too bad, real ham is ..., end of ham before 2010 (I
bookmake? that :-)), ...
Let me suggest some new nice endless controversial subjects :
Which one was the first on earth egg or hen ?
And by the way, the angels, are they male or female ?
************
Jacques
on4kjp@ibm.net
on4kjp@on5vl.lg.bel.eu
on4kjp@on4kjp.ampr.org
***********************
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 07:28:46 +1100 (EST)
From: csmall@gonzo.triode.net.au (Craig Small)
Subject: AEA up for sale; customer service closed
Alan Cox typed:
>
> > Don't fool yourself, amateur radio is in far greater trouble than many
people
> > want to admit. Sure, it isn't going to disappear tonight or tomorrow, but
> > unless something significant happens it will disappear. That means that
not
> > only will I have to look for a new job I will also need a new hobby!
>
> I think its fair to say that for now the internet has dealt amateur radio a
> body blow with the regulators coming in to give a good kicking while down.
>
> I don't think it will die out. Amateur radio survived as a small hobby for
> very many years where people built everything themselves [I think I should
> just plug my father in at this point and hit play ;)]. That aspect won't
But there is one, significant, difference then before.
In ye olde days, if amateur radio operators didn't use a band then it didn't
matter. There was heaps to go around and no-one though much of it was any
use.
Today, well I don't need to tell everyone how wireless communications has
exploded. If the bands aren't used, I'm quite sure there are a lot of
To be continued in digest: tcp_96_252B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
