| |
PA2AGA > TCPDIG 02.12.96 03:01l 217 Lines 6848 Bytes #-10802 (0) @ EU
BID : TCP_96_251A
Read: DG7DAH GUEST
Subj: TCP-Group Digest 96/251A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0FSG<DB0IGL<DB0KCP<HB9OS<HB9EAS<DB0GE<LX0PAC<ON7RC<ON4AWP<
ON6AR<PI8HWB<PI8VAD<PI8VNW
Sent: 961129/1955Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:48504 [Hoek v Holland] FBB5.15c
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : TCPDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21653 ; Fri, 29 Nov 96 19:37:46 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.1) with SMTP
id AA00000340 ; Fri, 29 Nov 96 20:30:36 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga with SMTP
id AA00000332 ; Fri, 29 Nov 96 20:28:53 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga-1 (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.5.5) with SMTP
id AA00008632 ; Fri, 29 Nov 96 20:28:52 MET
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 96 20:24:28 MET
Message-Id: <tcp_96_251A>
From: pa2aga
To: tcp_broadcast@pa2aga-1
Subject: TCP-Group Digest 96/251A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
TCP-Group Digest Thu, 28 Nov 96 Volume 96 : Issue 251
Today's Topics:
? Sources of WA8DED Host for PK87 ? (2 msgs)
AEA up for sale; customer service closed
I need a TCP/IP address assigned
IP v 6 (10 msgs)
IPv6, and AEA final
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 17:49:28 +0100
From: "Martino Mori" <ik4drv@provincia.ra.it>
Subject: ? Sources of WA8DED Host for PK87 ?
Hi all, sorry for off-topic, but this is is the only ham related news-group
I receive.
A good friend of mine, IK4BLV a tcpip guru in my area, is seeking for the
sources
of AEA PK87 WA8DED Host, or even better some documentations on how
upgrade that tnc with a kiss eprom. He said that a standard kiss won't work
because the particular hardware of such tnc, so he need to know something
more.
Any answer is welcomed.
73 de ik4drv
Martino
email: ik4drv@racine.ra.it
ax25: ik4drv@ik4icz.#ra.iemr.ita.eu
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 20:42:28 -0700 (MST)
From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@primenet.com>
Subject: ? Sources of WA8DED Host for PK87 ?
On Wed, 27 Nov 1996, Martino Mori wrote:
> Hi all, sorry for off-topic, but this is is the only ham related news-group
> I receive.
>
> A good friend of mine, IK4BLV a tcpip guru in my area, is seeking for the
> sources
> of AEA PK87 WA8DED Host, or even better some documentations on how
> upgrade that tnc with a kiss eprom. He said that a standard kiss won't work
> because the particular hardware of such tnc, so he need to know something
> more.
> Any answer is welcomed.
A WA8DED host mode eprom for the PK-87 is available from Tucson Amateur
Packet Radio (TAPR) for $12.00 U.S. plus shipping. See
http://www.tapr.org to order.
Bob
----
Bob Nielsen Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: w6swe@w6swe.ampr.org
AX.25: w6swe@wb7tls.az.usa.noam
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 14:13:07 -0500
From: Jim De Arras <jmd@cube.WestLab.com>
Subject: AEA up for sale; customer service closed
Brian Kantor wrote:
>
> Gentlemen, this debate does not belong on this mailing list.
> - Brian
How many times are you planning to send me this? It's starting to
become a spam.
I have stopped dicussing the topic in the group.
Stop these messages...
Jim
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 20:11:32 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@oklahoma.net>
Subject: I need a TCP/IP address assigned
use 44.28.64.200
I *guarantee* it won't conflict :-)
That'll put you in the north texas domain (top 18 bits). The IP
coordinator only owns the lower 14 bits, so 64-255 are available.
Later when the IP coordinator gets back with you (maybe next
year) you can switch to what he gives you. Meantime, have
your "Buds" just put your chosen IP in their tables...
Another good way, is to put on the BBS that you are the new
IP coordinator. That really gets their attention :-)
Third, put a message on KF5MG's station, or WB5CQU's station.
They both are big in IP, and are sure to point you the right way.
----------
> I am looking to get a TCP/IP address assigned. I have sent mail to the
> last person I knew to be the area coordinator for the North Texas/Dallas
> area (Eric Martin) and have received no response over the last 4 weeks.
>
> Dave Covert, KB5GOG
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:14:49 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ron Atkinson <n8fow@hamgate.cc.wayne.edu>
Subject: IP v 6
My mailer said Brian Kantor said this:
>
> I propose that we set a goal of transitioning to IPv6 by Jan 1 2001.
> That's only 5 years away. Do you think we can do it?
> - Brian
For those of us that run Linux and BSD systems we'll probably be running
it long before that. Can't speak for the NOS folks though, but somebody
will probably add in IPv6 support soon to keep it alive and compatible
with the rest of the world once sites start showing up.
Ron N8FOW
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 18:02:00
From: Sacha Bernstein <sacha@ee.gatech.edu>
Subject: IP v 6
> I propose that we set a goal of transitioning to IPv6 by Jan 1 2001.
> That's only 5 years away. Do you think we can do it?
(Well, actually it's closer to 4 years, but anyway...)
Excuse my ignorance, but I'm sure there are a few other people on the list
who don't know this:
Is there a "transition date" for the internet in place? (i.e. A date our
gateways will have to speak IPv6 regardless of amprnet)
Has anyone started working on a version of NET/NOS that supports IPv6?
Do any of the free *nixs (Linux, FreeBSD, etc.) support IPv6? (or are
people
working on it yet)
I haven't really looked at what IPv6 says, so maybe I'm misunderstanding
it.. If
some of my question don't make any sense, that's probably why...
If the software to do this is available by 1999 or 2000, I don't think it will
be
that difficult to get people to change over. There will be people who go
early,
and many more who are late, but overall I think it can be done. For example,
when
the gateways changed to PID 4, most of them did so with only a few that took
another
week or month to get over...
If the gateway operators are responsible enough to convert by Jan 1, 2001, and
most of their local network with them, any connected part of the amprnet will
have
to follow to remain connected to amprnet.
Comments? Corrections?
Sacha, N2NSZ
---
Sacha J. Bernstein
To be continued in digest: tcp_96_251B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
