| |
PA2AGA > TCPDIG 14.10.96 23:34l 188 Lines 5998 Bytes #-10854 (0) @ EU
BID : TCP_96_219B
Read: DG7DAH GUEST
Subj: TCP-Group Digest 96/219B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0SEL<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<DB0ACC<PI8DRS<
PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8WFL<PI8MBQ<PI8VNW
Sent: 961014/1753Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:22398 [Hoek v Holland] FBB5.15c
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : TCPDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA18745 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 17:30:28 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.1) with SMTP
id AA00006188 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:13:51 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga with SMTP
id AA00006163 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:10:54 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga-1 (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.5.5) with SMTP
id AA00008180 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:10:50 MET
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:08:37 MET
Message-Id: <tcp_96_219B>
From: pa2aga
To: tcp_broadcast@pa2aga-1
Subject: TCP-Group Digest 96/219B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
recurry@insighttec.com
recurry@inside.intel.com
----------
> From: wb9mjn@wb9mjn.ampr.org
> To: tcp-group@UCSD.EDU
> Subject: RE: 2300 MHz band reallocated
> Date: Saturday, October 12, 1996 3:25 AM
>
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Well, that s just great. How are Hams , or anybody interested in
learning
> RF / Radio systems supposed to make a data network between houses, with
> any kinda efficient use of resource? 2300 to 2310, and 2390 to 2400 made
per-
> fect Duplex pair for Spread Spectrum full duplex radio system, up to a
> megabaud information rate. Now we are back to LOUSY simplex again.
>
> Do the politicians realise, that the Amateur allocations are the Ed-
> ucation allocations, as well. Do u think they read the laws they have
made,
> in particular paragraph 97.1 of the Communications Act of 1934?
>
> All this retoric about Education during the recent Presidential
Debates,
> must have been just that, rhetoric. They DO NOT REALLLLY GIVE A Rats REAR
> END ABOUT GETTING KIDS TRAINED UP TO WORLD STANDARDS AT ALL. It just
sounds
> good when they say they are.
>
> Let alone the fact that the nation is falling head long into the
Centralised
> Radio System model, with NOTHING left for any new ideas. 10 years from
now,
> there wont be any spectrum left, or need for RF engineers to develope new
> system designs.
>
> This has to be about the absolute worse spectrum to take away from Ed-
> ucational uses, as this time. With the chip sets that are out there, from
> other successful comercial ventures, new technigues could be pioneered on
> a budget. But, NO, every last drop , every last tree standing, has to be
> profitized.
>
> We HAMs have to start to get really voiciferous. This is the last
straw.
> It makes no sense for the country to screw the future. We have to tell
> EVERYBODY that that is just what CONGRESS and the FCC are getting away
with.
>
>
> 73, Don.
>
> Mailbox : WB9MJN @ N9HSI.IL.USA.NA
> AMPRNet : wb9mjn@wb9mjn.ampr.org[44.72.98.19]
> Internet: wb9mjn%wb9mjn.ampr.org@uugate.aim.utah.edu
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:44:38 GMT
From: John.Greenwood@nessie.mcc.ac.uk (John Greenwood)
Subject: KISS for Windows
On Sat, 5 Oct 96 22:24:15 GMT, you wrote:
>
>Is there anyone with the time,knowledge and inclination to assist me in
writing a KISS I/F for windows allowing TCP/IP Software to be used directly
with a TNC (Instead of using a Network)..
I've just been speaking to Dave G8KBB the author of the X1J
code/firmaware which includes Netrom + IP routing for TNC/2 clones.
He tells me that if there is a demand for SLIP to be added he will
gladly implement it in the X1J code.
73 de John G4XHS
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 17:19:23 -0500
From: Steve Sampson <ssampson@oklahoma.net>
Subject: KISS for Windows
Tell him to put PPP in, or SLIP as a second choice.
Then tell him to get rid of the Netrom stuff. Make
it a pure IP box.
John Greenwood wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Oct 96 22:24:15 GMT, you wrote:
> >
> >Is there anyone with the time,knowledge and inclination to assist me in
writing a KISS I/F for windows allowing TCP/IP Software to be used directly
with a TNC (Instead of using a Network)..
>
> I've just been speaking to Dave G8KBB the author of the X1J
> code/firmaware which includes Netrom + IP routing for TNC/2 clones.
> He tells me that if there is a demand for SLIP to be added he will
> gladly implement it in the X1J code.
>
> 73 de John G4XHS
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 96 04:04:00 -0000
From: mikebw@bilow.bilow.uu.ids.net (Mike Bilow)
Subject: KISS for Windows
John Greenwood wrote in a message to Mike Bilow:
JG> I've just been speaking to Dave G8KBB the author of the X1J
JG> code/firmaware which includes Netrom + IP routing for TNC/2
JG> clones. He tells me that if there is a demand for SLIP to be
JG> added he will gladly implement it in the X1J code.
If he's up for it, PPP would be much nicer. We could use it to encapsulate
protocols other than IP, particularly netrom, and PPP's embedded FCS would
overcome one of the most annoying oversights in the KISS protocol.
-- Mike
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 96 19:56 GMT
From: dk3uz@dk3uz.hanse.de (Edmund H. Ramm)
Subject: SLIP for TNC-2
In ampr.bbs.tcpdig you write:
>Edmund H. Ramm wrote:
>>
>> Walter, dl1haz, has ported SLIP to the TNC2. Works fine with e.g.
Trumpet
>> WinSock, he says. For details you might wish to contact him @db0hht.
>You might ask him to upload the binary and/or source
>to ftp.ucsd.edu. Many would be interested I'm sure.
>Might even be a rebirth of the TNC-2 :-)
>Steve
As Walter has no internet access, asking him to upload the sources
wouldn't acchieve very much, I fear. If you're interested, pse try packet.
73, Eddi
--
dk3uz@db0hht.ampr.org - ehramm@dk3uz.hanse.de - DK3UZ@DB0HHT.#HH.GER.EU
QTH Hamburg-Bramfeld, FN31a
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V96 #219
******************************
You can send your message for this bulletin
to: tcp-group@pa2aga on .AMPR.ORG-net
or: tcpaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu on BBS-net
------
NOT TO: pa2aga@pa2aga or pa2aga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu PLEASE!!
It will get posted automatically within a few days
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
