| |
PA2AGA > TCPDIG 14.10.96 23:29l 164 Lines 5394 Bytes #-10854 (0) @ EU
BID : TCP_96_220B
Read: DG7DAH GUEST
Subj: TCP-Group Digest 96/220B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0AHO<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0SEL<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<DB0ACC<
PI8DRS<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8WFL<PI8MBQ<PI8VNW
Sent: 961014/1755Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:22400 [Hoek v Holland] FBB5.15c
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : TCPDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA18749 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 17:40:37 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.1) with SMTP
id AA00006196 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:17:11 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga with SMTP
id AA00006165 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:11:22 MET
Received: from pa2aga-1 by pa2aga-1 (NET/Mac 2.3.62/7.5.5) with SMTP
id AA00008182 ; Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:11:18 MET
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 19:08:42 MET
Message-Id: <tcp_96_220B>
From: pa2aga
To: tcp_broadcast@pa2aga-1
Subject: TCP-Group Digest 96/220B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Minnesota
Amprnet: bob@n0qbj-uhf.ampr.org (44.94.9.9)
WWW (Amprnet only): http://kunk.n0qbj.ampr.org/
Packet: N0QBJ@WB0GDB.#STP.MN.USA.NOAM
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 19:53:05 -0700
From: "Ron Curry" <recurry@insighttec.com>
Subject: 2300 MHz band reallocated
Don,
Yes, you bring up some good points. Especially W.R.T. technology advances
making it more available to amatuers at the same time as commercial. I
guess I would agree that just because commercial wants it doesn't mean we
should give it to them. We should evaluate which is the greater good in
terms of fostering technology growth as well as providing services.
Best regards,
Ron
----------
> From: wb9mjn@wb9mjn.ampr.org
> To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
> Subject: RE: 2300 MHz band reallocated
> Date: Sunday, October 13, 1996 3:30 AM
>
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> That s why I am really pissed about this. The available chip sets, and
> cheapness of test equipment for this band, allows for us to have a great
> chance of breaking the pattern. A reasonable cost radio system, to do
high
> performance, and efficiency data network was possible until this
happened. I
> was looking at devlopeing a plug and play system, that was full duplex,
and
> off the shelf. But now, there is just not going to be enuf perfomance in
> the idea, in the remaining spectrum to make it a worthwhile venture. My
in-
> vestment in time, test equipment, and technical literature has been
wasted
> by the government.
>
> Its not how many people that are on a band that counts. It is the long
term
> availability of the band that engenders usership. As technology advances,
> each higher band becomes practical for low cost development. If the
government
> takes away each practical band, as it become practical to be used, by
industry,
> and consequently, by us, they are cheating us out of the Communications
> Act of 1934 contrat with the citizenship.
>
> Why does industry want this spectrum now? THE VERY SAME REASON WE WANT
IT
> NOW. We can make ready use of it in the next 10 years.
>
> Ron, you are letting urself be duped by the lobyist persuation
rhetoric. The
> 1.9 Ghz networks are just going on line here, in the Chicago area, this
winter.
> That did not happen overnight. But, it is happening because they have the
> spectrum on a long term basis. Hams are no different. 2.3 Ghz band has
been
> nibbled away over the last decade, relentlessly, and steadily. I
initially
> was not interested in it at because of this. And advised people who were
to
> ignore it, because of this. But, I was overcome by how sweet a system
could
> be done on the remaining spectrum space. Only to be too GD trusting of
the
> SH Politicians.
>
>
> 73, Don.
>
> Mailbox : WB9MJN @ N9HSI.IL.USA.NA
> AMPRNet : wb9mjn@wb9mjn.ampr.org[44.72.98.19]
> Internet: wb9mjn%wb9mjn.ampr.org@uugate.aim.utah.edu
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 22:39:45 +0100
From: Mike Dent <mike@unixphf.ampr.org>
Subject: JNOS with ESCC card and SCC driver??
I am mailing the following for a friend, replies to the list or to myself
please.
Thanks
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
I am running jnos with a PA0HZP card and two 1200 modems.
I have three problems:
1. What are the attach lines.
I am using the following at present:
attach scc init 150 4 2 0 1 168 5 p4915200
attach scc 1 ax25 2m 256 d1200 1024 g4rwo-5
attach scc 3 ax25 70 256 d1200 1024 g4rwo-5
Are these correct?
2.I would like to use one side of one escc chip to run as a timer to
give me a tick value of 10ms. How do I do it in jnos?
3. To get the prog to run I had to up the mem ibufsize to 3072
Is this correct?
Are there any other things I should know about to get the prog working
at its optimum?
Many thanks for your help.
--
73 de Dave
Dave York G4RWO Barrow Cumbria UK
AX25net : g4rwo@gb7ulv.#14.GBR.EU
AMPRnet : g4rwo@gb7mbb.ampr.org
IP : 44.131.1.130
-------------------------------------------------
--
"I remember when NOS was NET and all you got was "Welcome to TTY-link.." "
Mike Dent. G6PHF. Morecambe, Lancs. UK.| BBSnet=G6PHF@GB7MBB.#16.GBR.EU
AMPRnet=g6phf@gb7mbb.ampr.org | INTERnet=mike@lurpac.lancs.ac.uk
WWW=http://www.lurpac.lancs.ac.uk/g6phf/g6phf.html | BayBBS +44 (0)1524
833222
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V96 #220
******************************
You can send your message for this bulletin
to: tcp-group@pa2aga on .AMPR.ORG-net
or: tcpaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu on BBS-net
------
NOT TO: pa2aga@pa2aga or pa2aga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu PLEASE!!
It will get posted automatically within a few days
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
