|
VK2TV > RSGB 01.07.07 05:38l 38 Lines 1133 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 23584_VK2TV
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK2TV > repeater farce
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<DB0GRL<SR6BBA<SR1BSZ<WA7V<KD4YAL<VK2TV
Sent: 070701/0421Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:14391 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:23584_VK
From: VK2TV@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To : RSGB@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to VK2TV
# On : 7/1/2007 14:17:26
# UTC: 7/1/2007 4:17:26 A
>From: KB2VXA@NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
>To : RSGB@WW
>
>Hi Ray and all,
>I'm not a walking rule book so if interested you can always download Part
>97 from just about anywhere. What sticks in my mind is that repeaters had
>to ID with /R but that's been dropped in recent years, could be the FCC
>realized we're smart enough to recognize a repeater when we hear one. The
Maybe the FCC got smart enough to recognise a repeater.
>term "private" is wide open to interpretation so I'll go with "closed"
>which means it's not open to use by the general ham population. Those are
Closed repeaters have never been permitted down here.
>a land line dial in BBS. Remember those? For those who don't they were
>the "internet" version of a packet BBS except for not being part of a
Never used one but I remember them.
>That's my waffle for today, too bad the syrup won't modulate.
But if you bring your syrup to the boil, doesn't it undergo amplitude modulation?
Cheers ... Ray
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |