OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
EB2DVY > PSK31    16.09.99 04:21l 215 Lines 6923 Bytes #-9817 (0) @ WW.SYD.NSW.
BID : 389-EB2DVY
Read: OE1RRB GUEST
Subj: PSK31 Digest V1 #171
Path: OE1XAB<OE3XSR<OE5XBL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<SP6KBL<SP6YCU<SR6DJG<
      SR6DJC<SR9ZAA<PP5BLU<XE3DX<EA5RQ<EA5VDR<EA2BBS<EA2C<EA2K<EA1URR<EA1URM<
      EA2RCF<EA2G<EA2URV
Sent: 990910/2319Z @:EA2URV.EABI.ESP.EU #:7163 [URV-ABRA Bilbao] $:389-EB2DVY
From: EB2DVY@EA2URV.EABI.ESP.EU
To  : PSK31@WW.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC

De: Psk31 Digest <owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es>
Para: <psk31-digest@aintel.bi.ehu.es>
Asunto: Psk31 Digest V1 #171
Fecha: viernes 10 de septiembre de 1999 4:36


Psk31 Digest        Friday, September 10 1999        Volume 01 : Number 171



In this issue:

    [psk31] Logger Version 6.09 and Windows NT problems?
    [psk31] Diagram of IC-730
    RE: [psk31] PSKGNR troubles
    RE: [psk31] AFC/NET in Logger V6.09
    Re: [psk31] Logger Version 6.09 and Windows NT problems?
    [psk31] professional opinion sought-fsk or psk? OT

See the end of the digest for information about psk31-digest

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:09:17 -0500
From: "Karl Heimbach" <heimbachk@mindspring.com>
Subject: [psk31] Logger Version 6.09 and Windows NT problems?

Gang,

Anyone running Logger and Windows NT?  I am new to the program and like it,
but am having difficulty with the PSK window.  (I am running Windows NT
Workstation 4.0 with Service Pack 5).

When I send CQ via the "CQ macro button", once the CQ completes, I am unable
to transmit via the "transmit button".  If I close the PSK window and then
reopen it, I'm able to transmit normally.

If I transmit via the "transmit button", and then send CQ via the "CQ macro
button",
the process repeats itself - must close the PSK window and reopen.

Also, if I change any of the text in the macro keys, I must close the PSK
window and reopen before I can send a CQ or transmit.

Any and all suggestions appreciated.

Karl - W5QJ

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:21:28 -0700
From: "Herman Cueva" <hcueva@david.intertel.hn>
Subject: [psk31] Diagram of IC-730

Does any of you guys has the diagram or the manual of an Icom IC-730. A
friend of my, HR5FWM damaged his radio and need the info to repair it.
Thanks.
HR1HCP

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:36:13 +0200
From: "Pauli Nunez" <p.nunez@mx2.redestb.es>
Subject: RE: [psk31] PSKGNR troubles

Hi Kurosaki San,

If the path to PSK31SBW you have introduced in PSKGNR has the same spelling
as that of your note, then it will never work. Please check it as the '/'
character after C: is invalid. The correct path should be
C:\PSK31\PSK31SBW.EXE.

Regards and good luck

Pauli, EA3BLQ

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 07:05:19 -0400
From: "Walter Pfiester" <pfiester@dreamscape.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] AFC/NET in Logger V6.09

This bears a repeat ... I wouldn't call it a "Bug" but then again ... Hmmm

Walt W2TQK
<mailto:pfiester@dreamscape.com>


| At 11:33 AM 9/6/99 -0400, K2hto@aol.com wrote:
| >Hi Gang,
| >
| >In a previous message to the list I had mentioned that.......
| >
| >The biggest PROBLEM found is......................
| > If you lock on with the "afc" the xmit frequency does not
| follow even though
| >the "net" box is checked. Therefore you really can't use the
| "afc" which is a
| >problem.
| Hi Marty,
| If you first click on AFC after tuning a signal, then click on NET,
| the TX freq will jump to the RX freq and stay there without following
| his signal.  So what you should do is just before the other station
| signs the first time, click on NET.  That way, you have locked your
| TX signal to his at that one time.  You don't want your TX to follow
| his signal all the time.  If you do, you will be leapfrogging each other
| all over the band.  NET works the way it should, and the way I
| operate when using the other programs, PSK31SBW and MixW32.
| With the other programs, I have to turn NET off after zeroing him once
| to keep from following him up or down the band.  On Logger, I don't.
| I don't consider it a bug but a feature, but for uniformity and
| consistency
| sake it could be changed to operate the same as the other two programs.
|
|
|
| >Did not notice this in version 6.08d unless I overlooked it.
| >
| >Besides the Latitude/Longitude/Beam Headings/Sunrise/Sunset
| never working
| >correctly (guess this should be sent to the Logger List) the AFC
| bug is the
| >only one I can see. Elated to see all the other bugs fixed.
| Thanks again Bob.
| >
| >Does anyone else notice the AFC problem? It is strange that
| >PSKsbw/Mix32/Logger all have different ideas for startup in
| AFC/NET. Let's
| >get together as it is a bit confusing.
| >
| >73, Marty K2hto
| >http://members.aol.com/martyk2hto
| >

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:50:27 -0400
From: Charles Greene <cgreene@loa.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Logger Version 6.09 and Windows NT problems?

At 10:09 PM 9/8/99 -0500, Karl Heimbach wrote:
>Gang,
>
>Anyone running Logger and Windows NT?  I am new to the program and like it,
>but am having difficulty with the PSK window.  (I am running Windows NT
>Workstation 4.0 with Service Pack 5).
>
>When I send CQ via the "CQ macro button", once the CQ completes, I am unable
>to transmit via the "transmit button".  If I close the PSK window and then
>reopen it, I'm able to transmit normally.
>
>If I transmit via the "transmit button", and then send CQ via the "CQ macro
>button",
>the process repeats itself - must close the PSK window and reopen.
>
>Also, if I change any of the text in the macro keys, I must close the PSK
>window and reopen before I can send a CQ or transmit.
>
>Any and all suggestions appreciated.

I had the same problem, but in Win98.  Try deleting the $cwid$ at the end.
____________

Try PSK31.

Chas, W1CG

Rhode Island TCPIP Address Coordinator
w1cg@arrl.net
_____________

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 13:44:21 -0400
From: "Art Allen, KY1K" <aballen@colby.edu>
Subject: [psk31] professional opinion sought-fsk or psk? OT

Hi everyone,

I became interested in building dgps receivers after learning how much the
comm'l units cost::>

Anyway, I downloaded the spec for the data transmtters and protocol and
it's not clear whether they are transmitting psk or fsk. The spec sounds
like it is talking about PSK, but several home brewers have told me it's
really FSK. I can forward the written spec to anyone who is interested, but
I am willing to bet that it is not helpful!

The data is 50, 100 or 200 baud and the overall bandwidth is claimed to be
1.17 times the baud rate, The channels are spaced at 1 khz intervals
between 285 to 325 khz. Anyone in the US should hear signals there, and
most likely anyone in a coastal area anywhere in the world should hear
signals there too.

If someone could tune in and tell me whether these are PSK or FSK, I'd
appreciate it.

After I figure out what type of signal it is, I need suggestions for small,
low power portable electronics for receiving these signals-but for now I
really need to know whether these are FSK or PSK.

Off list reply preferred.

Thanks, 

Art

------------------------------

End of Psk31 Digest V1 #171
***************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 03.08.2026 03:52:13lGo back Go up