| |
PA2AGA > PACDIG 22.10.99 18:33l 251 Lines 7007 Bytes #-9685 (0) @ EU
BID : PR_99_260B
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: PacketRadioDigest 99/260B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0AIS<DB0IZ<DB0QS<DB0ACC<PI8DRS<
PI8ZWL<PI8APD<PI8WNO<PI8VAD<PI8HGL<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991022/1215Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:9713 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:PR_99_260
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : PACDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21874 ; Fri, 22 Oct 99 11:51:33 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00016595 ; Thu, 21 Oct 99 18:35:55 MET
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 99 18:19:02 MET
Message-Id: <pr_99_260B>
From: pa2aga
To: pr_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: PacketRadioDigest 99/260B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
CB,
> > Commercial, Military, Pirate, etc..)
> >
> > Hmmm?
> >
> > Or maybe just one PACKET ng, that covers the same categories for Packet?
> > (Ham, CB, Commercial, Military, Pirate, etc..)
> >
> > Get the picture?
>
> OK, so since "rec.radio.cb.packet" or some similar-named group doesn't
exist,
> are you going to go host one so this guy can re-ask his question in the
newly
> formed obviously proper newsgroup?
No need for that, Einstein; He can simply go to any of the exising CB
newsgroups or take a gander at one of the hundreds of European CB-Packet
websites.
Too complicated for you? I'm not surprised.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 19:17:59 GMT
From: Arian© Alien® <Arian@myself.com>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
He did go to the correct newsgroup!!!
so drop it already.
>
>Moron D. Stussy <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
>news:Pine.LNX.4.10.9910201017570.1718-100000@dns.bde-arc.ampr.org...
>> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Charles Brabham wrote:
>> > OK, everybody:
>> >
>> > What percentage of alt.ham-radio.packet should be dedicated to CB, I
>wonder?
>> >
>> > Should a similar percentage of CB radio newsgroups be dedicated to
>> > ham-radio.packet?
>> >
>> > Hey, why not just have ONE newsgroup for ALL Radio-related stuff? (Ham,
>CB,
>> > Commercial, Military, Pirate, etc..)
>> >
>> > Hmmm?
>> >
>> > Or maybe just one PACKET ng, that covers the same categories for Packet?
>> > (Ham, CB, Commercial, Military, Pirate, etc..)
>> >
>> > Get the picture?
>>
>> OK, so since "rec.radio.cb.packet" or some similar-named group doesn't
>exist,
>> are you going to go host one so this guy can re-ask his question in the
>newly
>> formed obviously proper newsgroup?
>
>No need for that, Einstein; He can simply go to any of the exising CB
>newsgroups or take a gander at one of the hundreds of European CB-Packet
>websites.
>
>Too complicated for you? I'm not surprised.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 02:13:26 GMT
From: n5pvl_sux@my-deja.com
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
In article <7uf5td$2npo@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net> wrote:
>
> D. Stussy <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
> news:Pine.LNX.4.10.9910180324220.174-100000@dns.bde-arc.ampr.org...
> ...
> >
> > No wonder many foreign countries hate Americans. Our friend here
(Mr. CB,
> and
> > yes, the pun is intended) is a perfect example of the European view
of
> > Americans. The A in America stands for A**h***. Hmmm, both have 7
> letters....
> > There's our American goodwill for you!
>
> "Our friend here" has done more than any other Ham in the US to bring
> together European and US digital Hams, moron. Next time, take the
trouble to
> find out who you are shooting your mouth off about.
You ain't done shit and you know it. All you do is operate a third-
rate PBBS and hang out on the internet and argue with everyone that
doesn't kiss your fat ass. How anyone like you, who alienates everyone
you come into contact with, can claim to have done ANYTHING to bring
ANYONE together is beyond me. GET A LIFE!!!
>
> Sorry you are too ignorant to understand why CB related discussion is
not
> appropriate on a Ham-Radio newsgroup. Most of us have no trouble
> differentiating between Ham Radio and CB... Sorry you do.
That's right.... you try to tell everyone what's "proper" on packet, so
it makes sense that you'd be telling people what's "proper" in Usenet
too. Do us all a favor.... find another hobby!!
>
> --
>
> 73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
> N5PVL @ N5BIGJOKE.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
> http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 07:48:25 GMT
From: noone@nowhere.com (KC2FCR)
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 02:13:26 GMT,
n5pvl_sux@my-deja.com wrote:
<snip>
>
>You ain't done shit and you know it. All you do is operate a third-
>rate PBBS and hang out on the internet and argue with everyone that
>doesn't kiss your fat ass. How anyone like you, who alienates everyone
>you come into contact with, can claim to have done ANYTHING to bring
>ANYONE together is beyond me. GET A LIFE!!!
>
>> Sorry you are too ignorant to understand why CB related discussion is
>not
>> appropriate on a Ham-Radio newsgroup. Most of us have no trouble
>> differentiating between Ham Radio and CB... Sorry you do.
>
>That's right.... you try to tell everyone what's "proper" on packet, so
>it makes sense that you'd be telling people what's "proper" in Usenet
>too. Do us all a favor.... find another hobby!!
>
The fun part is that whining about what's supposed
to be in which group results in far more posts
than if the original question was just answered in
the first place.
97.1 The rules and regulations in this part are
designed to provide an amateur radio service
having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the
following principles.
97.1 (b) Continuation and extension of the
amateur's proven ability to contribute to the
advancement of the radio art.*
97.1 (e) Continuation and extension of the
amateur's unique ability to enhance international
goodwill.**
* Note that 91.1(b) doesn't say "amateur radio
art". Parts 91.1(a), 91.1(c), and 91.1(d) mention
the amateur service by name. It hardly seems
accidental that these words are left out in
paragraphs b and e.
In other words, being generally helpful rather
than an international pinhead is a requirement of
the regulations governing US amateur operation,
and thus a matter of federal law. (For those of
us that don't have the common sense to do it
anyway.)
------
Just random thoughts
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 05:12:36 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
<n5pvl_sux@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:7ulsrt$5bf$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
Ever notice how the really "big-boy" types that want to talk real bad have a
tendency to *attempt* to hide their identities?
I usually do not equate cowardice in a discussion with relevance.
Cowardice, lying... It's all part of the same basic lack of character.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
End of Packet-Radio Digest V99 #260
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: packet-radio@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: praga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
