| |
PA2AGA > PACDIG 22.10.99 14:21l 193 Lines 6538 Bytes #-9689 (0) @ EU
BID : PR_99_259D
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: PacketRadioDigest 99/259D
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<DB0ERF<DB0SHG<DB0OBK<DB0ACC<PI8DRS<PI8DAZ<
PI8GCB<PI8HGL<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991022/0749Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:9667 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:PR_99_259
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : PACDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21834 ; Fri, 22 Oct 99 07:36:46 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00016559 ; Thu, 21 Oct 99 18:33:56 MET
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 99 18:18:43 MET
Message-Id: <pr_99_259D>
From: pa2aga
To: pr_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: PacketRadioDigest 99/259D
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
>> it. Have a look at http://www.forthnet.gr/sv2agw/start.htm
>>
>> There are also sound card drivers available for Flexnet.
>
>It is illegal to use FlexNet on non-ham networks. Take a look at the FlexNet
>web-site.
>
>Try to avoid advising people to do things that are illegal.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 22:25:31 +0000
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Charles Brabham wrote:
D. Stussy <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
> news:Pine.LNX.4.10.9910180324220.174-100000@dns.bde-arc.ampr.org...
> ...
> > No wonder many foreign countries hate Americans. Our friend here (Mr. CB,
> and
> > yes, the pun is intended) is a perfect example of the European view of
> > Americans. The A in America stands for A**h***. Hmmm, both have 7
> letters....
> > There's our American goodwill for you!
>
> "Our friend here" has done more than any other Ham in the US to bring
> together European and US digital Hams, moron. Next time, take the trouble to
> find out who you are shooting your mouth off about.
>
> Sorry you are too ignorant to understand why CB related discussion is not
> appropriate on a Ham-Radio newsgroup. Most of us have no trouble
> differentiating between Ham Radio and CB... Sorry you do.
Who said I didn't? I acknowledged that the question was off-topic, but I was
also SMART enough to recognize that there isn't another appropriate forum to
ask the question in. Furthermore, the off-topic portion of the question was
merely the incidental use of the technique in another radio service. It seems
more relevant that the question did ask for digital (i.e. "packet") radio
information, which is within the topic demonstrated by the name of this
newsgroup.
Secondly, as stated before, had you bothered to notice where the question was
coming from, you would not have spouted off about what this guy was
considering
being illegal, because in fact, it is not illegal where he is located. I see
no attempt where you acknowledged the fact that he is not here in the United
States and therefore NOT subject to our laws. You arrogantly assumed that
what
he was planning is illegal simply because it is illegal where you live. Your
attitude speaks for itself.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 19:09:03 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
Arian© Alien¨ <Arian@myself.com> wrote in message
news:vX8LOKTEq4YiIf4kOfPheh7f4QeU@4ax.com...
> I cant understand you "hams"
> 80% of you started out on CB but now you are to high and mighty.
> Get of your damm high horse.
> In the end its all about radio!
Another semi-literate jerk who cannot differentiate between Ham Radio and
CB.
How would you like it, Bub, if a certain Ham started hanging out on the
CB -related newsgroups spamming the CB'ers?
SPAM off, jerkoid. Sorry about you being too ignorant to figure out why they
name the newsgroups as they do.
--
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:42:58 GMT
From: Arian© Alien¨ <Arian@myself.com>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
3 cheers for you
>I think you will find that many of these hams who came from cb land
>probably did a bunch of illegal things there before they became hams,
>and now are over-compensating because they feel guilty, and by
>overreacting they are somehow redeeming themselves in their own eyes.
>
>
>Arian© Alien¨ wrote:
>>
>> I cant understand you "hams"
>> 80% of you started out on CB but now you are to high and mighty.
>> Get of your damm high horse.
>> In the end its all about radio!
>> >
>> >Roger Barker <roger@peaksys.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> >news:5Ag9eIAaGtC4EweR@peaksys.demon.co.uk...
>> >> In article <#tFqg4MG$GA.312@net025s>, Dave Lemmens <powerdave@hetnet.nl>
>> >> writes
>> >> >Could somebody tell me how I could use packet with a soundcard?
>> >> >I have a Meastro-2 soundcard 32bit. And a Capital Oslo CB 4Watt
>> >> >40 Channels. Could somebody send me how I could build a packet-
>> >> >modem for the soundcard. And software of course.
>> >>
>> >> If you're using Win95/8, the SV2AGW packet engine supports packet via a
>> >> sound card, and there are a good number of applications available for
>> >> it. Have a look at http://www.forthnet.gr/sv2agw/start.htm
>> >>
>> >> There are also sound card drivers available for Flexnet.
>> >
>> >It is illegal to use FlexNet on non-ham networks. Take a look at the
FlexNet
>> >web-site.
>> >
>> >Try to avoid advising people to do things that are illegal.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 10:16:40 +0000
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, William F. Hagen wrote:
> sometimes it is hard to tell where a post came from with the cryptic
> nature of the urls.
True, in general. However, a mail domain ending in ".nl" is probably from the
country that has that TLD - The Netherlands. Then if one doesn't believe
that,
go snooping with "whois" servers, etc.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 10:21:17 +0000
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: Packet with soundcard!
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Charles Brabham wrote:
Roger Barker <roger@peaksys.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:u$cIRDAvTCD4EwGh@peaksys.demon.co.uk...
> >
> > The following appears to attribute to me something that I did not write.
> > You are presumably complaining about the last two sentences, but they
> > were written by n5pvl@texoma.net, not by me. What sort of crap
> > newsreader are you using that manages to remove the author of the
> > message to which you are replying?
>
> Perhaps more to the point, Roger: Why is a CB'er being allowed to disrupt
> the discussion of issues related to alt.ham-radio.packet on this newsgroup?
>
> OK, everybody:
>
> What percentage of alt.ham-radio.packet should be dedicated to CB, I wonder?
>
> Should a similar percentage of CB radio newsgroups be dedicated to
To be continued in digest: pr_99_259E
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
