| |
G4VWL > PIRATE 01.07.09 12:10l 52 Lines 1745 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4299_G4VWL
Read: GUEST
Subj: RE:Reject =--> this callsign?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<ZL2BAU<GB7PZT<GB7MAX<GB7SAM<GB7OAR<
GB7OAR
Sent: 090626/0837z @:GB7OAR $:4299_G4VWL Sally 3.1.065
Message from: G4VWL@GB7OAR.#16.GBR.EU
Quoting from a previous message from VE3WBZ....
> DT:Thursday,June 25th.,2009 @0837Hrs. EST <JPST>
>
> Hello all, and just a question?
>
> I was reading a text from someone, about rejection of postings
> from this callsign he had listed, based upon his belief of
> that situation. Before that a comment "It must be a pirate"
> or to that effect.
>
> NOT confirmed, nor verified, thus if this poor chap decided
> to rejoin packetland, his call and use is suspect.
>
> Just a thought on the matter, before anyone, expecially a BBS
> sysop puts anyone into reject.
>
> 73 to all ....from Peter VE3WBZ
Thanks Peter.
I suspect mine is the callsign to which you refer.
I seem to have ruffled one or two feathers when I left packet about five or
six years ago and some people seem to have what I'd consider to be
unnecessarily long - and perhaps vindictive - memories for what is supposed
to be a hobby.
I've never been afraid to voice my opinions and that doesn't always sit well
with some people.
When I decided to give packet another go recently, I was pleasantly
surprized to hear our radio BBS still on air. I think it has turned into a
bit of a disappointment - though perhaps not too unexpected.
As my BBS is a RADIO BBS with difficult network connections, it's not really
practicable to enter into any meaningful "cut and thrust" discussions -
assuming, of course, I was mindful to do so - which is vey unlikely.
Thanks again for expressing a normal decent value which was always to be
expected from fellow radio amateurs - but which is rapidly disappearing here
in the UK, unfortunately.
73 John.
Timed Friday 26 June 2009 08:26 gmt
BBS G4VWL@GB7OAR.#16.GBR.EU
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
