| |
G0TEZ > INFO 02.08.02 12:33l 30 Lines 910 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 199_G0TEZ
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: "NASA" quality,VK5QX.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0HOT<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<IK1ZNW<ON0BEL<GB7FCR<GB7FYL<
GB7BOB<GB7HVU
Sent: 020731/0346Z @:GB7HVU.#16.GBR.EU #:32649 [Great Harwood] FBB7.00i $:199_G
From: G0TEZ@GB7HVU.#16.GBR.EU
To : INFO@WW
G0TEZ/TPK 1.83c Num 199 31-07-02T02:18:09 GMT: COLNE,Lancs:
Thank you Ian. I now know how to fit an 'N' type and what a 'file card' is.
I remain a litle confused about 'NASA quality'. UK engineering is often
done to 'aircraft quality' in the UK which is the best possible.
Sometimes it is done to Rolls Royce' quality, which is even better.
I assume 'NASA quality' is equivalent to 'Aircraft Quality' as NASA
vehicles such as shuttles do break down e.g., the 'O' ring failures.
Things built to RR quality just don't.
N.B. the term used to apply to Rolls Royce cars but now only applies to
aero engines as RR cars was sold to the Germans a few years ago.
All the best *
/
~/~
-----73---Ian.
"" ...............""""""
PEACE ON YOU MAN
iang0tez@fsmail.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
