| |
M0CLZ > INFO 02.08.02 14:42l 47 Lines 1177 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 7629_M0CLZ
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: "NASA" quality,VK5QX.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0HOT<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<GB7YKS<GB7LGS<GB7WIG<
GB7BAS
Sent: 020802/1150z 04205@GB7BAS.#31.GBR.EU $:7629_M0CLZ [Bowers Gifford, Esx]
ReplyingTo: 199_G0TEZ
From: M0CLZ@GB7BAS
I thought NASA quality was the lowest bidder :-)
Quoting from a previous message...
}
} From: G0TEZ@GB7HVU.#16.GBR.EU
} To : INFO@WW
}
} G0TEZ/TPK 1.83c Num 199 31-07-02T02:18:09 GMT: COLNE,Lancs:
}
} Thank you Ian. I now know how to fit an 'N' type and what a 'file card'
} is.
} I remain a litle confused about 'NASA quality'. UK engineering is often
} done to 'aircraft quality' in the UK which is the best possible.
} Sometimes it is done to Rolls Royce' quality, which is even better.
}
} I assume 'NASA quality' is equivalent to 'Aircraft Quality' as NASA
} vehicles such as shuttles do break down e.g., the 'O' ring failures.
}
} Things built to RR quality just don't.
}
} N.B. the term used to apply to Rolls Royce cars but now only applies to
} aero engines as RR cars was sold to the Germans a few years ago.
}
} All the best *
} /
} ~/~
} -----73---Ian.
} "" ...............""""""
} PEACE ON YOU MAN
} iang0tez@fsmail.net
}
}
}
73 Dick )
Timed Friday 02 August 2002 13:02 gmt
BBS M0CLZ@GB7BAS
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
