| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 12.10.00 02:11l 226 Lines 6731 Bytes #-8619 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_278B
Read: DB0FHN GUEST DO4SN
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/278B
Path: DB0ABH<DB0CWS<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 001011/1441Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:23957 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_278B
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 00 14:37:20 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_278B>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> is all. The other server users may loose out oh well! Such is life on the
> gateways eh? Remember there is always reverse hop check translation.
You are dead meat.
The above is a good advertisment to draw crackers.
Simple source ip hack, and I come from any ip I want you to see.
Plenty of open relays around, I could use one of them. They keep no logs..
But this whole topic has nothing at all to do with ham radio.
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:03:29 -0500
From: David <kb9lpk@telocity.com>
Subject: New tnos tcp/ip bbs gateway and ww convers system
Hank Oredson wrote:
>
> "David" <kb9lpk@telocity.com> wrote in message
> news:39E362E9.C6130F6@telocity.com...
> > Rob, DHCP translation logging still gives point of origin! Dynamic ip's
> > are masked to the server Ip. Its just a way to filter those who are
abusive
> > is all. The other server users may loose out oh well! Such is life on the
> > gateways eh? Remember there is always reverse hop check translation.
>
> You are dead meat.
> The above is a good advertisment to draw crackers.
> Simple source ip hack, and I come from any ip I want you to see.
> Plenty of open relays around, I could use one of them. They keep no logs..
>
> But this whole topic has nothing at all to do with ham radio.
Humm? FCC thinks it does but oh well sorry to bother you! Thanks for your
input! Still trying it. and Hacking is a way of life. Never know until you
try eh.
>
> --
>
> ... Hank
>
> http://horedson.home.att.net
--
'73 de David--kb9lpk <><
The box said "Win95,98,2000 NT4.0 or better" So I installed Linux #:0)
email internet: kb9lpk@telocity.com
Home page internet:http://members.telocity.com/~kb9lpk
Ham email: kb9lpk@kb9lpk.ampr.org. TNOS BBS Home Page: http://kb9lpk.ampr.org.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:06:37 -0500
From: David <kb9lpk@telocity.com>
Subject: New tnos tcp/ip bbs gateway and ww convers system
David wrote:
>
> Hank Oredson wrote:
> >
> > "David" <kb9lpk@telocity.com> wrote in message
> > news:39E362E9.C6130F6@telocity.com...
> > > Rob, DHCP translation logging still gives point of origin! Dynamic ip's
> > > are masked to the server Ip. Its just a way to filter those who are
abusive
> > > is all. The other server users may loose out oh well! Such is life on
the
> > > gateways eh? Remember there is always reverse hop check translation.
> >
> > You are dead meat.
> > The above is a good advertisment to draw crackers.
> > Simple source ip hack, and I come from any ip I want you to see.
> > Plenty of open relays around, I could use one of them. They keep no logs..
Hank you are more than welcome to try enjoy! Thanks for the input.
> >
> > But this whole topic has nothing at all to do with ham radio.
>
> Humm? FCC thinks it does but oh well sorry to bother you! Thanks for your
> input! Still trying it. and Hacking is a way of life. Never know until you
> try eh.
>
> >
> > --
> >
> > ... Hank
> >
> > http://horedson.home.att.net
>
> --
> '73 de David--kb9lpk <><
>
> The box said "Win95,98,2000 NT4.0 or better" So I installed Linux #:0)
>
> email internet: kb9lpk@telocity.com
> Home page internet:http://members.telocity.com/~kb9lpk
> Ham email: kb9lpk@kb9lpk.ampr.org. TNOS BBS Home Page:
http://kb9lpk.ampr.org.
--
'73 de David--kb9lpk <><
The box said "Win95,98,2000 NT4.0 or better" So I installed Linux #:0)
email internet: kb9lpk@telocity.com
Home page internet:http://members.telocity.com/~kb9lpk
Ham email: kb9lpk@kb9lpk.ampr.org. TNOS BBS Home Page: http://kb9lpk.ampr.org.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:58:49 -0500
From: David <kb9lpk@telocity.com>
Subject: New tnos tcp/ip bbs gateway and ww convers system
Hank Oredson wrote:
>
> "David" <kb9lpk@telocity.com> wrote in message
> news:39E2CD69.2F8613FA@telocity.com...
> > Hello all, I have recently setup a gateway 784kbs full duplex SDSL
> > feel free to telnet and join world wide converse system with other
> > amateurs around the world telnet://kb9lpk.ampr.org. or
> > just http://kb9lpk.ampr.org and see the 100% TNOS BBS www server
> > in action visit areas of interested ect. Just login in with call sign
> > and use any password you decide.
> >
> > BTW all traffic is monitored and logged with point of orgin and hop
checked
> > so please follow the good amateur practices and enjoy!
>
> "... good amateur practices ..." involve using radio.
> What modes and frequencies are you on?
430.350mhz 9.6kbs
145.590mhz 1.2kb
145.670mhz 9.6kb
links are on 430.350mhz 9.6kb and lnk 1 784kbs
hope that helps to answer question?
>
> --
>
> ... Hank
>
> http://horedson.home.att.net
--
'73 de David--kb9lpk <><
The box said "Win95,98,2000 NT4.0 or better" So I installed Linux #:0)
email internet: kb9lpk@telocity.com
Home page internet:http://members.telocity.com/~kb9lpk
Ham email: kb9lpk@kb9lpk.ampr.org. TNOS BBS Home Page: http://kb9lpk.ampr.org.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:20:07 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson \(K5OKC\)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net>
Subject: New to packet- need advice
An 8088 or a C-64 will work too, Gosh, even a "terminal" like the
ADM-3 should still be available at swap meets.
I'm kidding. A 486 is probably all you will find anymore that still
works, and has the speed and memory to run windows 95/98, and
the BIOS can handle modern interface cards without randomly
locking up or getting a blue screen of death (BSOD).
There was nothing wrong with the advice, and I don't know why
you feel the need to describe it as overkill, other than just to
show us your greater knowledge on the subject, and how stupid
everyone else is.
> > Well the old Kantronics KPC-3's work fine but the new pluses are a
> > bit better. For packet any old 486 or low grade pentium will work just
> > fine for packet.
>
> Heavens, if all you need is a terminal for a KPC-3, even an old 386 box is
likely
> to do the trick. Older machines are suitable, too, but the software support
is likely
> to be poor.
>
> Dana K6JQ
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:23:35 -0700
From: AC6V <ac6v@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: New to packet- need advice
bomc wrote:
> CQ Advice, CQ Advice DE AC7JO,
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_278C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
