| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 06.10.00 00:57l 197 Lines 6436 Bytes #-8625 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_271C
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/271C
Path: DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0CWS<DB0ROF<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0PKE<DB0OVN<ON5VL<
LX0HST<HA3PG<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE1NMB<PI8WFL<PI8HGL
Sent: 001005/1928Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:21835 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_271C
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 00 20:32:39 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_271C>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> far, PSK31 is really great, but I want to do more than copy the mail.....
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 21:44:42 GMT
From: helpfull@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
This is the first so called "flame" I've ever written. I think it's
well written and has many good points. It's up to you to decide if it's
deserved.
In article <1R6C5.62$0a3.51834@nnrp1.sbc.net>,
"Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net> wrote:
>
> Haw Hawr! I've often accused flamers of being a few bricks short of
a load,
> but no need to here. This old boy's post speaks for itself.
>
> --
> 73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
> n5pvl@swbell.net
> http://home.swbell.net/n5pvl/
>
> <helpfull@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8rap44
$5tt$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Look Charlie! Put down the broken beer bottle and shut the hell up.
You
> > are obviosly stupid or you wouldn't have you real name posted is
hear.
> > Your one sided neanderthal thinking isn't helping anyone.
> >
> > My point is that wanting to change, enhance, ungrade and or fix the
FCC
> > regs is NOT the same as disregaurd for them. I'm not talking about
the
> > kind of childish repeater interference that you probably do
yourself.
> > I'm talking about new tecnologies and REAL benefits. I do NOT
condone
> > breaking the law. Open your eyes.
> >
> > Your kind says they want to keep the ham bands from being sold off
but
> > in truth you are a kin to CB'ers trying to commander the band for
your
> > own special interest! What's more your know-it-all fat headed swill
is
> > getting old. I don't care what you've accomplished technically if
your
> > going to be an ass. This is a lesson that all Hams best consider or
we
> > will stagnate or die until the old gaurd dies off. I'm not that
young
> > and so I personally don't care to wait for the foolishness to stop.
> > Just cease and stop being a big baby!
> >
> > Hugs and kisses
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
> >
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 21:40:00 GMT
From: helpfull@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
Stop making foolish assumptions and being a know it all. I never said
to send the microwaves through the mountains. Most of us know the
basics. This is the kind of snobery we DON'T need. The challange is HOW
might we do it otherwise.
Of couse you missed my point that nay sayers like you ridiculed our
inventive forefathers too. Get on the inventive bandwagon or get off
the road. You're in the way.
73 anyway
n article <sti3r0s4rrh239@corp.supernews.com>,
"Steve Sampson \(K5OKC\)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote:
> Well, I didn't think you were serious. Now that I see you really
> are serious, I will only say that you are right and I am wrong.
>
> I wish you the best success in designing new laws of physics
> to do what you would like. I know that someone will eventually
> find a way for microwaves to go through mountains, and for
> forests to have 0 dB of attenuation. It may even be yourself!
>
> <helpfull@my-deja.com> wrote
>
> > > > You might say an airplane can't fly because the laws of gravity
or
> > > > physics will not allow it. This was the belief. Not to mention
the
> > > > sound barrier. Now these amazing feats would appear as magic and
> > > > unbeleivable to our nay saying forfathers.
> > >
> > > Your spam machine needs a spell corrector.
> > >
> >
> > You ass needs a good spanking little one. When you can't argue a
point
> > then put them down for spelling errors then right? This kind of
> > perfectionism we don't need. Stop filling the groups with YOUR spam
> > that's off topic.
> >
> > My point was; our innovative forefathers didn't put up with this
nay-
> > saying crap and neither should we. If you're not for innovation
you're
> > against it.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 23:50:19 GMT
From: horseshoestew@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <wkcC5.15920$tl2.1119152@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net> wrote:
>
> <horseshoestew@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:8rage1$tnv$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <39D7EC79.B4B56094@att.net>,
> > "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net> wrote:
> > > Spoken like a true, experienced Free-bander . . .
> > >
> > > This is an amateur radio NG and amateurs are bound by law and
moral
> > > conduct to obey FCC regulations.
> >
> > Oh, please! I suppose you are going to tell me that you never drove
> > over 55mph, when that was the national speed limit?
>
> Stew, you advocate breaking the law?
When they are ridiculous laws - of course. The National 55mph speed
limit WAS a ridiculous law. Whole States disobeyed it. Eventually it
was overturned.
> > > Afraid that you are trying to preach to the wrong choir here.
> >
> > Bullpucky. Drop the "holier-than-thou" routine.
>
> You call W5YR a lawbreaker?
The 55mph speed limit is not really that much of a law. If you were
caught surpassing it(within moderation), you were guilty of
an "infraction". You were NOT put in jail(as long as you paid your
fine).
I view the perceived "content restrictions" on Amateur Internet access
in much the same light. There are no clear cut rules. Hams sell ham
gear all the time using amateur frequencies, and many even make a small
living at it - that is somehow OK. As long as "blabbermouths" didn't
go complaining to the FCC - we could also have free wireless access to
the Internet. While anal-retentive spoil-sports have helped to
restrict growth up to this point - it has really been the lack of
applications that have stopped the growth of Internet-backboned packet
systems. Now, with the increasing capabilities and dropping prices of
PDAs - a new applications arena is beckoning(it might not involve Web
access, but portable e-mail, chat, newsgroups, and stock quotes are
VERY doable applications at 9600bps - even 1200bps). I say just try to
ignore the spoil-sports, as they putter along in the slow lane at
55mph - blocking-up traffic. Besides, if they put up too much of a
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_271D
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
