| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 03.10.00 23:37l 244 Lines 7554 Bytes #-8627 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_270B
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/270B
Path: DB0ABH<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<HA5OB<HA3PG<IK1ZNW<EA7URC<PE1NMB<
PI8HGL
Sent: 001003/1833Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:21078 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_270B
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 00 19:16:55 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_270B>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> or off the Ham bands) people would take notice? What could be better
> for Ham radio's future?
>
> :)
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 17:25:32 GMT
From: horseshoestew@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <39D7EC79.B4B56094@att.net>,
"George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net> wrote:
> Spoken like a true, experienced Free-bander . . .
>
> This is an amateur radio NG and amateurs are bound by law and moral
> conduct to obey FCC regulations.
Oh, please! I suppose you are going to tell me that you never drove
over 55mph, when that was the national speed limit?
> Afraid that you are trying to preach to the wrong choir here.
Bullpucky. Drop the "holier-than-thou" routine.
> 72/73, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
------- Stewart - N0MHS --------
Wireless High-Speed Networking and
Public Radio Services Information(MURS,FRS,GMRS,ARS,CB):
http://www.pubcel.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 18:55:43 GMT
From: "O.C." <mortuus1952@my-deja.com>
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <39D62011.92247570@junglevision.com>,
Cathryn Mataga <cathryn@junglevision.com> wrote:
>
>
> "O.C." wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > 50Kbaud over amateur radio. It may have been as high as 100 Kb,
> > with several people in the San Francisco area having similar
> > equipment.
> >
>
> Really, I thought they were just running 9600 baud on Tekks.
> If they're doing 56K, I'm very interested. I think I have
> a line of site path to some of the higher hills in Palo Alto
> from here in Berkeley.
This was 2 years ago. Stanford had it, and the folks i was
talking to in the San Jose and east-bay areas were going to
get set up for it. They (and the jnos mailing list inhabitants)
were very very helpful in getting me set up in 1997. Some of
them probably frequent this newsgroup.
Orrin wn1z
--
Nemo me impune lacessit!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:39:01 GMT
From: helpfull@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <stehqf9n10ov03@corp.supernews.com>,
"Steve Sampson \(K5OKC\)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote:
> > You might say an airplane can't fly because the laws of gravity or
> > physics will not allow it. This was the belief. Not to mention the
> > sound barrier. Now these amazing feats would appear as magic and
> > unbeleivable to our nay saying forfathers.
>
> Your spam machine needs a spell corrector.
>
>
You ass needs a good spanking little one. When you can't argue a point
then put them down for spelling errors then right? This kind of
perfectionism we don't need. Stop filling the groups with YOUR spam
that's off topic.
My point was; our innovative forefathers didn't put up with this nay-
saying crap and neither should we. If you're not for innovation you're
against it.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:53:45 GMT
From: helpfull@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
Look Charlie! Put down the broken beer bottle and shut the hell up. You
are obviosly stupid or you wouldn't have you real name posted is hear.
Your one sided neanderthal thinking isn't helping anyone.
My point is that wanting to change, enhance, ungrade and or fix the FCC
regs is NOT the same as disregaurd for them. I'm not talking about the
kind of childish repeater interference that you probably do yourself.
I'm talking about new tecnologies and REAL benefits. I do NOT condone
breaking the law. Open your eyes.
Your kind says they want to keep the ham bands from being sold off but
in truth you are a kin to CB'ers trying to commander the band for your
own special interest! What's more your know-it-all fat headed swill is
getting old. I don't care what you've accomplished technically if your
going to be an ass. This is a lesson that all Hams best consider or we
will stagnate or die until the old gaurd dies off. I'm not that young
and so I personally don't care to wait for the foolishness to stop.
Just cease and stop being a big baby!
Hugs and kisses
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:41:25 GMT
From: helpfull@my-deja.com
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <39D7EC79.B4B56094@att.net>,
"George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net> wrote:
> Spoken like a true, experienced Free-bander . . .
>
> This is an amateur radio NG and amateurs are bound by law and moral
> conduct to obey FCC regulations.
>
> Afraid that you are trying to preach to the wrong choir here.
>
> 72/73, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
> Fairview, TX 30 mi NE Dallas in Collin county QRP-L 1373
> Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 55th year and it just keeps getting better!
> Icom IC-756 PRO #02121 (9/00) Kachina #91900556 (12/99) IC-765 (6/90)
>
> helpfull@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > If enough hams start doing it, the
> > > FCC will probably just change the rules to allow it, or start
another
> > > service that will allow it. The public are being FOOLS for paying
> > huge
> > > initial equipment costs, and $40/month for wireless Internet
service.
> > >
> > > ------- Stewart - N0MHS --------
> > > Wireless High-Speed Networking and
> > > Public Radio Services Information(MURS,FRS,GMRS,ARS,CB):
> > > http://www.pubcel.com
> > >
> >
> > HERE, HERE! I agree with this. This is what I'm saying. I hope you
> > people read this. I hope you get the point. I hope all hams consider
> > this wisdom as to the "rules". let's show them what Hams are made
of!
> > Don't you know if we could start providing some real benifits (both
on
> > or off the Ham bands) people would take notice? What could be better
> > for Ham radio's future?
>
I simply say again....
Don't you know if we could start providing some real benefits (both on
or off the Ham bands) people would take notice? What could be better
for Ham radio's future?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:24:45 GMT
From: jra@febo.com (John Ackermann)
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
In article <8ralna$2jp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, O.C. <mortuus1952@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>> Really, I thought they were just running 9600 baud on Tekks.
>> If they're doing 56K, I'm very interested. I think I have
>> a line of site path to some of the higher hills in Palo Alto
>> from here in Berkeley.
>
>This was 2 years ago. Stanford had it, and the folks i was
>talking to in the San Jose and east-bay areas were going to
>get set up for it. They (and the jnos mailing list inhabitants)
>were very very helpful in getting me set up in 1997. Some of
>them probably frequent this newsgroup.
The Tekk radios can do 19.2kb if you replace the stock IF filters (at 21.4MHz)
with wider ones. PacComm in Florida sells a version that already has the mod,
or can provide the parts if you want to do it yourself. I'm not aware of the
Tekks being modified to run faster than that, though.
John N8UR
jra@febo.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:10:55 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net>
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_270C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
