OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
ZL3AI  > BPQ      05.08.99 16:09l 18 Lines 661 Bytes #-9935 (0) @ WW
BID : ZL3AI144839
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re^3: BPQ in General
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<
      PP5BLU<WB0TAX<VK7AX<N8ZFM<ZL2TZE<ZL2TZE<ZL2VGB<ZL2WA<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 990803/2145Z @:ZL3VML.CHC.NZL.OC #:38503 [CHCH-NZ] FBB5.15c $:ZL3AI144839
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.CHC.NZL.OC
To  : BPQ@WW

Hi all,

The fact remains that no matter what anybody says, FlexNet users continue to
report anything from 10-15% even up to 100% throughput improvement.

Having used FlexNet myself, with BCT and with T4, over some really poor paths,
I agree with these findings, experiencing at first hand somewhere between at
least 20% up to what is likely to be perhaps 100% improvement in throughput.

I apologise for letting some simple facts spoil what was shaping up to be a
good debate, but I suppose the debate will continue anyway!

73, David.
                                                                     T4 1.5à24


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 17.10.2026 23:09:15lGo back Go up