| |
PE1RDW > BPQ 06.08.99 01:50l 31 Lines 1195 Bytes #-9934 (0) @ WW
BID : 293-PE1RDW
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Obsolesence
Path: DB0AAB<DB0KFB<DB0CZ<DB0GV<DB0SIF<DB0NHM<DB0SHG<DB0HSK<PI8DRS<DB0ACC<
DB0SM<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8ZAA<PI8SHB
Sent: 990805/1931Z @:PI8SHB.#NBO.NLD.EU #:15677 [SBOSCH] FBB $:293-PE1RDW
From: PE1RDW@PI8SHB.#NBO.NLD.EU
To : BPQ@WW
[¯¯¯ TST HOST 1.43c, UTC diff:5, Local time: Thu Aug 05 23:23:31 1999 ®®®]
>From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
>To : BPQ@WW
>>There are better alternatives if you want to stay in the "Net/Rom gang"
>Then use x-net or the net node, they can both use net/rom and flexnet but the
>protocols used between thenetnodes or x-nets nodes etc is much better than the
>net/rom used by bp.
>
>>There is LinuxNet which has Net/Rom and is compatible to Flexnet.
>Is it the same old net/rom as bpq, not improved in any way like thenetnodes is?
>But it is although its improvements not as good as flexnet.
Linuxnet is basicly the same as (x)net its just a port for linux but with
an extra, it can act like a tnc2 with tf2.7 (for use with tnn)
>
>>Stations that are "sandwitched" between both systems should consider using it.
>They can also use x-net and some others!
(X)net can not use as many types of modems as linuxnet because can
interface to the kernal ax25 drivers.
another plus for linuxnet over (x)net is that you can run other aplications
on the same pc (xffb ftpd httpd conversd etc. etc.)
73 de Andre pe1rdw
http://www.pe1rdw.demon.nl
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
