| |
G0FTD > ANT 19.05.06 09:59l 12 Lines 330 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 9D4629G0FTD
Read: DG1VV GUEST OE5AKM OE7HNT
Subj: Re: Antenna competition
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0HDF<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0BI<DB0NOS<DB0EA<DB0RES<ON0AR<
IW8PGT<SP7MGD<CE8FGC<VK6HGR<GB7ESX<GB7NNA
Sent: 060519/0718z 06907@GB7NNA.#31.GBR.EU $:9D4629G0FTD [Witham, Esx]NNA V3.1
HB9ABX wrote:-
> If one manages to keep the sum of all loss resistances
> below the radiation resistance, the resulting efficiency
> is above 50 percent.
You could have a 2cm antenna on 80m and achieve 100% efficiency, but it
will still produce a lousy signal.
Haven't you heard of the term "effective aperture" yet ?
- &y -
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
