| |
W0RLI > WLAN 21.09.03 06:36l 54 Lines 1111 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 16472W0RLI
Read: DB0FHN OE5RCO DK5RAS DO6NP GUEST
Subj: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<N2BQF<KD4GCA<N1UAN<WB1CHU<
K1UGM<W1ON<W1ON-5<K1UOL<N7QDN<N7QDN<KB7ZPJ<W0RLI
Sent: 030920/1435 25716@W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
<G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU> wrote in message news:000141261PZT...
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
> X-Mailer: XServ v407 WebMail
>
> This is seriously off-topic sorry,
>
> VK3JMA wrote:-
>
> >Not worth a regards
>
> Whatever your intention, such a comment implies contempt for the
> person to whom you are replying.
Perhaps that was the intent.
> This is one of the problems with packet - downright discourtesy.
> Plus an excessive willingness to attack the character of anyone
> with whom you disagree.
As you have just done.
> Most hams don't behave like this when they have a voice QSO.
And done again.
> No matter what the idealogical differences, Radio Hams
> are usually civil to each other on voice, so why not
> on Packet?
And you did it again!
> If *you* feel my views don't deserve a "Regards", then simply
> use the neutral "73", and if you feel they don't even
> deserve the common courtesy of a "73", don't put anything,
> rather than making a derogatory comment.
And yet again!
--
... Hank
Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
