| |
G8PZT > WLAN 20.09.03 01:52l 29 Lines 848 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 000141261PZT
Read: DB0FHN OE5RCO DK5RAS DO6NP GUEST
Subj: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0IUZ<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<ZL2BAU<
VK7AX<GB7YKS<GB7YFS<GB7MAX<GB7PZT
Sent: 030919/0920Z @:GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU [Kidderminster] #:14100 XSERV407j
From: G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU
To: WLAN@WW
Subject: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
X-Mailer: XServ v407 WebMail
This is seriously off-topic sorry,
VK3JMA wrote:-
>Not worth a regards
Whatever your intention, such a comment implies contempt for the
person to whom you are replying.
This is one of the problems with packet - downright discourtesy.
Plus an excessive willingness to attack the character of anyone
with whom you disagree.
Most hams don't behave like this when they have a voice QSO.
No matter what the idealogical differences, Radio Hams
are usually civil to each other on voice, so why not
on Packet?
If *you* feel my views don't deserve a "Regards", then simply
use the neutral "73", and if you feel they don't even
deserve the common courtesy of a "73", don't put anything,
rather than making a derogatory comment.
73, Paula
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
