| |
DF3VI > UIVIEW 18.09.04 09:36l 17 Lines 643 Bytes #-7615 (250) @ WW
BID : I9EDB0OVN008
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re^2: Call Suffix
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0HOT<DB0LPZ<DB0ERF<DB0ROF<DB0ACH<DB0PRA<DB0OVN
Sent: 040918/0732z @:DB0OVN.#NRW.DEU.EU [BCM West<>Link-Neus] obcm1.06b25 LT:25
From: DF3VI @ DB0OVN.#NRW.DEU.EU (Patrick)
To: UIVIEW @ WW
X-Info: Sent with login password
G6ZNW wrote:
>I agree, it would be good to have a consencus as to which ssid's should be
>used for which sort of vehicle.
>However, nothing should be imposed. Anything along these lines would have
>to be by full agreement only.
Stan, either you are still dreaming, or are quite unexperienced. There never
was, and maybe never will be such a thing as "full agreement" among Hams :-)
Is there anything that speaks against using the proposal of WB4APR (except
that you did it different, because you had not seen the standard before)?
73, Patrick
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
