| |
SM7UZI > TSTH 02.06.99 22:29l 35 Lines 1524 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : SM7UZI5970
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: is it possible to use BPQ & Baycom
Path: OE1XAB<OE3XSR<OK0PBX<OK0PHL<SP6KBL<SP6PCM<SR6DJG<SR6DJC<SR9ZAA<PI8JOP<
DB0ACH<DB0HAG<DB0GOS<DB0FBB<DB0HSK<DB0SIF<DB0NHM<DK0MAV<DB0FC<DB0HES<
OZ7BOX<OZ5BBS<OZ4PAC<OZ4BBS<OZ4BOX<OZ7PAC<OZ3PAC<OZ3BOC<SK7IQ
Sent: 990602/1302Z @:SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU #:32336 [Malmö] $:SM7UZI5970 FBB7.00
From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
To : TSTH@EU
Hello.
It is possible but stupid!
> I have 2 Baycom modems attached to my 386sx25 running TSTHOST1.43b
>& using TFPCX 2.73 at present, my hope is to allow other stations connect
>from my port1 to stations on port2 and in the reverse as with the BPQ Node
>software.
Use flexnet instead.
It has a built in digipeater that allow other users to connect via your
system, guess that is what you want.
If you for some reason want a real node is the flexnet node very good and
it doesn't use much ram or computer power.
Why do you want bpq, tfpcx (or tfx) that you use now is a much better packet
driver?
But flexnet is even better, when using baycom modems much better.
And the node part of bpq is crap compared to other nodes avaliable, like
flexnet, x-net, thenetnode etc.
.a&$a. .a&$a. .a&$$$$$$$$$$&a. .a&$a. Anders Lageras
$$$$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$' `$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Lund Sweden JO65PQ
$' `$$ $$$$$$ `ý$$$$$s,s$$$$$ý $$$$$$ AARS Member No. 81
$s,s$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$' `$ Packet:
73 de SM7-$$$$$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$s,s$ SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
$$$$$$ $$' `$ a$$$$$$ý $$$$$$ E-mail: sm7uzi@qsl.net
$$$$$$a$$s,s$ a$$$' `$$$$$$&a. $$$$$$ ICQ#: 5161379
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$s,s$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Homepage:
`ý&$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$$$$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$ý' http://www.visitweb.com/uzi/
o==|=====-
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
