OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
PA7KK  > TREK     08.02.04 18:18l 45 Lines 2031 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 62015_PI8DAZ
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re. Asimov.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<OZ5BBS<PI8ZAA<PI8DAZ
Sent: 040208/1604Z @:PI8DAZ.#TWE.NLD.EU #:62015 [Hengelo] FBB $:62015_PI8DAZ
From: PA7KK@PI8DAZ.#TWE.NLD.EU
To  : TREK@WW


Hello Jeff.

>Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision", mooted this scenario LONG
>before other authors did as far as I am aware. He has been dead for over
>20 years. It was published around 1950, but I first read the book (And
>Ages in Chaos) some time in the early 60's. The "experts" decried his
>theories then, and do so even now, but his theories made great sense and I
>have seen no better explanation since. He suggested an enormous collision
>in the Gulf of Mexico, on the Yucatan Peninsular. A TV documentary several
>years back showed archaeologists proving this very thing by finding
>evidence of the impact of a crater of enormous diameter, half in the Gulf,
>half of it way inland. "Experts", I have found, are quite often wrong. Now
>they speak of "their" theory as if Velikovsky had never written of it 50
>plus years ago. How droll.

I also read the book a long time ago. He wrote about myths. Myths
he said, when they survive the ages, must be based on reality in the past.
If something really happened, our ancestors wrote it down, or told it to 
their childeren. The problem is that scientists do not accept this.
He also works a lot with explaining the origin, meaning of
(old) words if I remember well.
But was not this all about the planet Venus which acc. to Asimov,
once was on the move and caused a collision in our solar system ?
Worlds in Collision means planets in collision. Venus became
because of this a bad name. A planet was ofcourse something like
a god. They did not know it was like the earth, a world.
Heaven and the gods were above, it was simple as that. 
Now we smile about that, but their observation was not that stupid.
I think they got it all right afterall because the objects/gods in
heaven indeed ruled their life. (Sun, earth) So a Pharao like Achnaton 
(the heritic) worshipped the sun. Without the sun, no rain, no river
Nile, no food, no life. I was the visible god.

73's - Henry     PA7KK


     

>
>73 - Jeff, G4XNH @ GB7YKS


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 18.09.2025 06:44:59lGo back Go up