OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK2TV  > TNC      20.08.07 00:10l 51 Lines 1981 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 23770_VK2TV
Read: GUEST DK3HG
Subj: RE: What TNC do you have...
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<TU5EX<I0TVL<F6CDD<F6BVP<VK2TV
Sent: 070819/2146Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:17564 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:23770_VK
From: VK2TV@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To  : TNC@WW



# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to VK2TV
# On : 8/20/2007 7:46:46 A
# UTC: 8/19/2007 21:46:46 


>From: VE3WBZ@VE3FJB.#CON.ON.CAN.NOAM
>To  : TNC@WW

>Anyhow...know you know.     Anyone keeping score?

No, but it's certainly revealed a vast array of different hardware being used.

To add a new dimension to the discussion, I wonder why individuals chose what
they use?

My first foray into packet was with a second-hand Paccom TNC220, a
dualport, HF/VHF (but only one at a time) TNC. My experience with that
device was enough to make any sane person give packet away. Its performance
was totally unpredictable, which, I think, is why the original owner sold
it. It makes a useful paperweight, and one day I might rob the AMD chip and
build a Baycom style modem with it.

I then got into Baycom modems and at one stage had three running under BPQ
on a Win95 machine, which I suspect wasn't a good environment for so much
interupt activity, but it was a means to an end at the time. Prior to the
Win95 experience I had the TNC220 and a Baycom modem running on an old
10MHz AT computer under Linux. It booted and ran from the floppy as a
two-port packet switch.

About this point in time I started running a BBS, and between trying to get
the TNC22 to work reliably (with a variety of EPROMs), and Baycom modems that, I
think, weren't being reliably serviced by interupt requests, I reached
frustration saturation and bought a Baycom USCC>4 card with three modems.
From this point, I never looked back. When a quantity of second hand
MFJ1270BT TNC's became available I bought four of them, and they're all in
service.

The advantage, in my opinion, of a TNC being true TNC2 compatible (as is
the 1270B) is the variety of alternative EPROM images that are available.
This point was really driven home to me with the TNC220.

Apart from the splurge on the USCC card, my choices have been based on
economy.

Cheers ... Ray


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 11.07.2025 16:59:12lGo back Go up