| |
VK6BE > TECH 03.05.07 05:59l 32 Lines 1617 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : C80838VK6BE
Read: GUEST OE7FMI
Subj: Re: Mobile phone towers
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0ROF<DB0ACH<DB0PKE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<ON0BEL<I0TVL<
IK1ZNW<VE3FJB<WA7V<KD4YAL<VK2TV
Sent: 070503/0425Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:9464 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:C80838VK6
From: VK6BE@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To : TECH@WW
Well I said in a previous packet that the fuss about phone towers here in
the West has died down now and we don't hear anything about the alleged
problems. However we still have lobby groups formed around places such as
the Wagerup Aluminium smelter who claim all sorts of problems through the
proximity of the refinery to their homes. The company and the Government
agencies after exhaustive tests say there is no dangerous pollution to
the air around the refinery, but still the fuss from the residents
continues. They are getting respiratory problems and cancers; well so do
people where I dwell but there are no refineries or phone towers close to
my people.IN another case a few years ago parents of the Middle Swan State
School claimed that the local brick yard was making their children sick.
Again nothing could be detected by the appropriate agencies, but finally
the Government closed the school and built a new one a little further
away.
As far as radiation is concerned, what of radiation from such as house
wiring (at 50 Hz) electric blankets, etc. We hear not one complaint about
these yet some users develop cancer, though their problem is not likly to
be due to the radiation mentioned.
Bob VK6BE
>
> If there are cases of cancers etc around mobile phone towers, why then are
> there not clusters of cancers around all mobile phone towers ?
>
> I presume therefore that the random selection of people in the cases that
> have happened are susceptible to radiation induced cancers.
>
> Surely that is the problem, not the mobile phone tower.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
