OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
DK3UZ  > TECHNIK  18.10.06 19:08l 32 Lines 1336 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : EC3934J7CBVX
Read: GUEST DL8FBH DL6DBA DL1LCA DH0GHU
Subj: Re: congrats physics p.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DK0WUE<DB0RES<DB0GOS<DB0OVN<DB0IUZ<DB0FBB<DB0ERF<
      DB0SAW<DB0MAR<DF0HMB<DB0HHT
Sent: 061018/1653Z @:DB0HHT.#HH.DEU.EU [TCP/IP,JO43XP] BBSX-2.14L $:EC3934J7CBV

In <J78P9KDB0FOR@bbs.net> dk2za@db0for writes:

> By the way ... do you know this very old but somehow rather tricky problem?


>                         ---------------------------------------
>                         |                                     |
> A         |--------|    |    |--------|         |--------|    |    B
> o---------| 10 Ohm |---------| 10 Ohm |---------| 10 Ohm |---------o
>      |    |--------|         |--------|    |    |--------|
>      |                                     |
>      ---------------------------------------


> Many people find it difficult to determine the resistance between A and B.

> And if you found it out, how do you best explain it?

   Were I in school now, I'd kick my physics teacher's behind for
putting this question in a physics context, because it doesn't test
knowledge of Ohm's law,  but e.g. how to make the most complicated
drawing of three resistors connected in parallel, or one's quality of
two-dimensional imagination.

   Shrouding a simple question in obfuscating words equally deserves
some vicious kicks in the sitting place. A physics or electronics test
should be just that and not one of semantic ability.

   73, Eddi ._._.
--
   dk3uz@db0hht.ampr.org - dk3uz AT darc DOT de - DK3UZ@DB0HHT.#HH.GER.EU
                         QTH Hamburg-Bramfeld, FN31a


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 26.06.2024 17:33:40lGo back Go up