| |
VK6BE > ENERGY 29.05.05 12:26l 22 Lines 887 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 530129VK6BE
Read: GUEST OE7FMI
Subj: Re: Hydrogen, GM7HUD.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0EA<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<F6CDD<N2BQF<VK6HGR<
VK6ZSE<VK6TJ<VK6JY
Sent: 050528/0253Z @:VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC #:60352 [Albany] wFBB7 $:530129VK6B
From: VK6BE@VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC
To : ENERGY@WW
Well if what I read is correct some nations have already gone the nuclear
way, and without any Chernobyls. Let's face it that tragedy was due to
poor design and negligence on the part of the country concerned. There are
probably more accidents in conventional power stations, oil rigs and coal
mines than in nuclear plants. Certainly we tolerate terrible carnage on
our roads with barely a sigh, but one accident in a nuclear plant sends
shock waves round the world. It is time we got our priorities right.
Bob VK6BE
>
> Both choices look awful to me. But I admit, if we would run
> out of oil sooner than anticipated, and no other energy
> could feed the demand, the masses and I most likely
> would embrace nuclear energy, if our way of living would collapse.
> One cannot not hang on to a dream.
>
> 73's - Henry, PA7KK.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
