| |
ZL3AI > APRDIG 21.06.03 19:06l 39 Lines 1390 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1493-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Jun 14, 3/3
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0FSG<DB0GAP<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0LEL<DB0TTM<DB0FP<DB0SON<
DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0IUZ<DB0GOS<DB0EEO<DB0RES<ON0AR<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 030616/1331Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:2593 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:1493-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To : APRDIG@WW
Subject: Re: Better than 52 simplex
From: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:14:30 -0400
X-Message-Number: 11
Bob Bruninga wrote:
>>Promoting this at least in the Cheyenne WY area
>>for at least mobile stations is great so what do we do about the fixed
>>stations that refuse to comply?
>
>User Education!, User Education!, User Education!
I would want to add, diplomacy. People don't like to be told what they
should not do. Email would certainly not be my choice of medium to
convey this information. I would talk to them face to face if possible,
or contact them over the phone. A personal contact will take a lot of
the barriers away. Remember that they are indeed in control and you need
to get them to do something voluntarily (so that they still feel that
they are in control). Any indication to an owner of a station of a
thread that they lose control of will be met by resistance. Rather than
telling them to turn of the PL off I would stress that they can use CTSS
only on their fixed station so they can still be aware of what is going
on if someone in their immediate vicinity uses VA. Offer an alternative
that will meet their needs and what will help you out, too.
But what do I care, right. I still think that Voice Alert is bad amateur
practice anyway.
73,
--Alex KR1ST (dead serious)
---
END OF DIGEST
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
