OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
ZL3AI  > APRDIG   03.04.03 12:06l 217 Lines 6901 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1102-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Mar 29, 4/4
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0FSG<DB0PV<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<VK7AX<IK6PYS<
      W4JAX<KD4GCA<N2BQF<VK3TE<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 030402/0959Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:63110 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:1102-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To  : APRDIG@WW

Subject: RE: Internet feed vs. FINDU.COM
From: "AE5PL Lists" <HamLists@ametx.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:37:11 -0600
X-Message-Number: 27

If it shows up on findu.com, then it is showing up on APRS-IS as that is
how findu.com gets its packets.  There are many factors that could cause
you to not see a particular station via a specific APRS-IS feed:

The server you are connected to is not configured properly.
The server the IGate is connected to is not configured properly.
The port you are connecting to is a filtered port.
The packet has NOGATE or RFONLY in it.
The packet is malformed.

I am sure there are other reasons, as well.  The first 2 were a major
problem over the previous years.  With improvements in server software
and in IGate software, they have become less of a problem, but still
exist in limited instances.

This is where it is advantageous for sysops to upgrade to the latest
release of the software they are using.  It also would be extremely
helpful for sysops to review their configurations and eliminate
connections to historical ports (10151) and hub ports (1313).  Also,
simultaneous connections to multiple servers only increases loading on
those servers without enhancing reliability.

Keep in mind, too, the timestamp on findu.com.  The last time KC8FWD-5
was heard on findu.com was 6 days ago.

73,

Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete@ae5pl.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: New winaprs maps
From: Robbie <mwrobertson@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:38:14 -0600
X-Message-Number: 28

Hi all,

Since I have not seen the subject brought up yet, I will ask what and 
where did the new WinAPRS release maps come from? These are not maps I 
have come to enjoy in the past.

Will the new release still support Precision Mapping even though it 
doesn't fill the screen?

Thanks

Robbie,  wa9inf

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: XASTIR
From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:48:46 -0800
X-Message-Number: 29

Use the callpass program (which gets compiled and installed along with
xastir) to calculate your registration number.

Bob, N7XY

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Digipeating and fun with PIDs
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:36:46 +1000
X-Message-Number: 30

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 07:54:46PM +0500, Steve Dimse wrote:
>By your reasoning, if you run a server that happens to have software with
>a security flaw, there is nothing wrong with me using that exploit to crash
>your system. You ought to have fixed the bug!

If you are maliciously crashing my system that is unacceptable. But if
you are doing something otherwise innocent which causes my buggy system 
to crash, that's indeed my problem.

Hamish
-- 

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: XASTIR help needed
From: Andrew Rich <andrew.rich@bigpond.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 11:51:17 +1000
X-Message-Number: 31

I am confused guys, what do you need to generate a number for ?
I am in the same boat, all i have ever been able to do is use .MAP
files.

Can someone help me out, I have gifs and the relavant cord files set up,
and had the same results, could not see any maps. 

If you can help me that would be really cool !

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: XASTIR help needed
From: Andrew Rich <andrew.rich@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 12:20:24 +1000
X-Message-Number: 32

>here is what i have
> 
>-rw-r--r--    1 c880105  c880105     25830 Feb  4 20:25 AUSAYF31.MAP
>-rw-r--r--    1 c880105  c880105     48080 Feb  4 20:25 AUSAYF32.MAP
>-rw-r--r--    1 c880105  c880105      2234 Feb  4 20:25 AUSAYF33.MAP
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root           85 Mar 16 21:36 placeholder
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root           97 Mar 30 12:10 test.geo
>-rwxr--r--    1 c880105  c880105    432600 Mar 30 12:08 test.gif
> 
>[root@pentium4 maps]# more test.geo
> 
>FILENAME test.gif
>#       x   y   lon     lat
>TIEPOINT        0       0       -180    90
>TIEPOINT        639     319     180     -90
>IMAGESIZE       640     320
>[root@pentium4 maps]#

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Trouble with aprs.rutgers.edu?
From: "Jacob Tennant" <k8jwt@ntelos.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:58:32 -0500
X-Message-Number: 33

I have tried 5 times today to access the ftp section at aprs.rutgers.edu but
everytime I have tried on 2 different machines it locks up my computers and
I have to restart to get them back?

Has anyone else had this problem?

Jacob Tennant  K8JWT

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: Trouble with aprs.rutgers.edu?
From: bftet@netscape.net (Bill Tetens)
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 22:21:40 -0500
X-Message-Number: 34

I had the same problem today and never did get it to work.

Bill

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: XASTIR help needed
From: KC7ZRU - Tate <kc7zru@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:22:55 -0700
X-Message-Number: 35

Andrew,

Back when the APRS-IS was supervised and maintained by a single person 
(Thanks Steve!!) a rudimentary 'authentication' system was setup - above 
and beyone whatever registration schemes various software authors 
implimented.

Idea was, that in order to connect to any of the then existing servers, 
a 'validation key' was required. Intent was to allow only licensed or 
otherwise authorized individuals access to the APRS-IS. I think.

I may well be a bit fuzzy on that, but the general gist of it is there - 
it's been awhile.

Anyway, when that person had to toss in the towel and let whatever was 
going to happen to the APRS-IS happen, he also released the algorythm to 
generate these 'validation keys' to the public.

The validation is a remnant and gesture towards allowing only those 'in 
the know or otherwise allowed' full access and connectivity to the ARPS-IS.

xastir, aprsd and maybe others include utilities to generate these 
'validation keys'.

And no, they're not the same as the registration keys for some software.

73

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: NOSaprs 1.15b4 patch available
From: Maiko Langelaar <maiko@langelaar.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:02:53 -0600
X-Message-Number: 36

Greetings all,

I have released a small patch to fix some problems. This
patch should only be applied for those running 1.15b3. For
complete details, including what NOSaprs is, please visit
my website at the following URL :

  http://www.qsl.net/ve4klm/packet/aprss.html

Best regards,

Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM

---

END OF DIGEST


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 15.11.2026 09:29:09lGo back Go up