| |
ZL3AI > APRDIG 23.10.03 04:32l 58 Lines 2003 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2181-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Oct 20, 4/4
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<ON0AR<WB0TAX<7M3TJZ<
SP7MGD<ZL2TZE<ZL3VML
Sent: 031022/1247Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:10968 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:2181-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To : APRDIG@WW
Subject: [aprssig] RE: OpenTracker
Current PCB prototype next to a TinyTrak3 for comparison:
http://www.opentrac.org/tracker3.jpg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Smart DIgis and the new Paradigm
From: Wes Johnston <wes@johnston.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:23:12 -0400
X-Message-Number: 24
At 06:45 PM 10/20/2003, you wrote:
>We could add a digi flag "NOAUTO" which would insist that it should NOT be
>autoigated. You might say that this is adding length to the packet....
>this is true. So it boils down to statistics:
>
>The status QUO is that we gain nothing by auto-IGate path truncation
>unless ALL users add "IGATE" to their path.
>
>My experience is that statistically, the RELAY solution would accomplish
>the intention of reduction in QRM while leaving the status QUO does not..
NOAUTO seems to fit right in with NOGATE.... this may work.... I just don't
want to PREVENT people from using the network... NOAUTO would allow me to
override the dynamic paths.... that will work. I don't want to say that
NOGATE should be used to prevent the smart digi's slick tricks however... I
may want my packet to NOT use smartdigi paths and still get to the
internet. You are right that 90% of the mobile trackers (the only ones
who should be using RELAY) just wanna get to the internet.
My concern all along was that we'd break the network and hem ourselves into
a corner so that I couldn't get "from here to there" via RF in an
emergency. I'm really surprised that no one else chimed in on this
thread... I guess they're all "power poled out".
Wes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Isabelle objects???
From: Jacob Tennant <k8jwt@adelphia.net>
Date: 20 Oct 2003 23:35:25 -0400
X-Message-Number: 25
Why is there still position objects for ISABELLE still floating around
on the inet feed???
Jacob Tennant K8JWT
---
END OF DIGEST
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
