| |
EA5AEB > PSK31 05.07.99 22:32l 22 Lines 914 Bytes #-9976 (0) @ WW
BID : 2685-EA5AEB~
Read: OE1RRB GUEST
Subj: Your opinion, pse...
Path: OE1XAB<OE3XPR<HA1VH<HG1PSO<HA5KDF<HG8GL<HA5OB<OK0PAB<OK0PBR<OK0PBB<
OK0PHL<OK0PPL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<DB0BOX<DB0ABH<DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0KFB<DB0CZ<
DB0LJ<DB0ACH<DB0RWI<DB0QS<DB0PKE<PI8DRS<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8ZAA<PI8HWB<
ON6AR<ON1CED<ON0CK<ON0DOR<ON0HU<LU2HJA<LU2FHE<EB5DJI<EA5AKC<EA5RKV<
EA5RCQ
Sent: 990630/1141Z @:EA5RCQ.EAA.ESP.EU #:46815 [Alicante] $:2685-EA5AEB~
From: EA5AEB@EA5RCQ.EAA.ESP.EU
To : PSK31@WW
[¯¯¯ TST HOST 1.43a, Dif/Utc.:0, Escrito el: Mar Jun 29 19:51:33 1999 ®®®]
Hello PSK'ers!
I believe that with the PSK should acquire new habits to give the
report. Almost always I receive RST 599. That object has to give control of
tone in PSK? Until now a control with inferior S to 3, were considered
that was annulling the QSO but, I am receiving many PSK signals with S 1
and even S zero and, however, in screen is entering perfectly the text. As
I work with only 3 watts, costs me to believe that it will be certain 59
that passes me a correspondent that uses 100 watts and to which my S-meter
indicates me S1 or even S zero.
Therefore, I believe that, with the PSK, a control RS 50 is
thoroughly correct if my S-meter indicates zero but I am receiving the text
full on screen...
I hope comentaries.
73, Adolfo
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
