| |
PA2AGA > PACDIG 31.05.00 08:23l 135 Lines 4015 Bytes #-9435 (0) @ EU
BID : PR_2000_136A
Read: GUEST
Subj: PacketRadioDigest 2000/136A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0RBS<DB0HOM<F6KFT<F6KWP<F6KIF<F6CDD<
PA3GMZ<PI8HZW<PI8WFL<PI8HGL
Sent: 000530/1847Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:45635 [Den Haag] FBB $:PR_2000_136A
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : PACDIG@EU
Date: Tue, 30 May 00 19:47:49 MET
Message-Id: <pr_2000_136A>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: pr_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Packet-Radio Digest Tue, 30 May 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 136
Today's Topics:
Bigger penis, better sex!
Is Anyone using mobile antenna for TH-D7A
TH-D7A & APRS
The Complete R.L. DRAKE Ham Museum...
TNC2H with FT100?
Yaesu VX1000
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Packet-Radio@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Packet-Radio-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Packet-Radio Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/packet-radio".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Packet-Radio:2000/136
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 29 May 2000 21:57:31 GMT
From: penis@veryhard.co.uk
Subject: Bigger penis, better sex!
Guys, does the size of your penis concern
you?
Maybe you would be happier with an extra
inch or two?
Would your partner be happier if you were
bigger and thicker?
Are there always too many reasons not to
make love any more?
Penis enlargement need not be an expensive
or painful operation.
To learn more about our natural system, and
read what other happy (and now more well
endowed) clients have to say.
Follow this link now!!!
http://www.penis.veryhard.co.uk/
(this is not a vacuum system!)
Cheers
Richard Brooks
penis@veryhard.co.uk
Telephone: UK 147007989914450
International: +44 7989 914450
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 14:19:02 GMT
From: "Lumpy" <lumpy@digitalcartography.com>
Subject: Is Anyone using mobile antenna for TH-D7A
Tony F. wrote:
> Is any one using the TH-D7A while mobile
> and with what type of antenna.
>
> Are you using packet ?? And if yes, with what kind of
PC.
GM Tony and the group -
Almost 100% of my ops are with a D7A since my job
has me traveling 27 days per month. I don't usually
do traditional packet, but I do APRS. Here's my setup.
Mobile -
I have one of those suction cup universal cell phone
holders that I stick to the window in the rental
car. The jaws then clamp the D7A and hold it safely.
I have a solid SMA to BNC antenna adaptor. Since I
perceive this SMA connection to be a physically
weak spot, I use a short bnc to bnc piece of coax
to relieve the strain on the adaptor. I run the
short coax through the holder clamp thing so that
the cable is held by the clamp. Then I connect the
rest of whatever antenna to that short coax.
For a mobile antenna, I have a little window bracket
thing that I found at HRO. It slides over the top
of your open or closed car window and has a bnc
on the outside of the car, and a length of coax
on the inside of the car. I usually just connect
that coax to the radio (via the strain relief short coax)
and put a rubber duck on the outside of the adaptor.
All of this means that the largest thing I have to carry
is the plastic cell phone clamp thing and a rubber duck.
I use a really cheap rubber duck and leave it on the
adaptor all the time so it also helps me find the
rental car in a parking lot.*
* road warriors know how often you find yourself
forgetting what kind of rental car you have that
week. Trying to put your key into someone elses car...
For a PC / Laptop -
I normally don't use one, since I'm op'ing APRS and
the D7A does that fine without PC. But when in the
hotel room I sometimes connect my laptop. It's a
typical Win95 IBM thinkpad. But for traditional
packet, and especially mobile, you'd probably
To be continued in digest: pr_2000_136B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
