| |
PA2AGA > PACDIG 20.02.00 07:26l 274 Lines 7731 Bytes #-9551 (0) @ EU
BID : PR_2000_40B
Read: GUEST
Subj: PacketRadioDigest 2000/40B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0FSG<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<OE3XSR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<9A0BBS<
9A0YDA<HA1KZH<HA5OB<HA3PG<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000220/0225Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:52777 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : PACDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA30725 ; Sun, 20 Feb 00 00:41:25 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018042 ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 17:18:57 MET
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 00 17:12:10 MET
Message-Id: <pr_2000_40B>
From: pa2aga
To: pr_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: PacketRadioDigest 2000/40B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> you
> > get into them pretty much because they all pretty much have the same
> old
> > crap in them. Satellite Packet.....sure, if you have the right TNC or
> > the right amount of power and radio's. ARPS.....well the only thing
> that
> > program is go for is to see where your buddy is. Sure it will help you
> > find out how the band is doing so you can write some one 1500 miles
> > away direct. Email sure packet has email that's if the person read's
> it
> > or decied to write you back. The problem I have with packet is that
> More
> > programs need to be written to give packet a varity and not the same
> on
> > crap. BBS's should also have a varity until something new comes allow
> > are these stupid ham opreators get through their heads packet will
> > reamin second if not last to the Internet.
> >
> > Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL
> > Packet operator since 1991
> >
> > In article <87npn6$n2j$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>,
> > "Inquisitor" <please.reply@newsgroup> wrote:
> > > Thank you anyway for your comment but this is not the kind of answer
> I
> > was
> > > looking for. I believe I was clear about my intent. I didn't say
> > anyone or
> > > there mode of choice needs to be justified. Since you bring it up; I
> > am
> > > saying Packet Radio should withstand the simple question of "what's
> > it good
> > > for"? Should it not? Choose your mode and leave my modes of choice
> to
> > me and
> > > the readers.
> > >
> > > We have about one real benefit that I read so far. That it is
> > available
> > > 24x7. Please let us know how it is beneficial to you. Not just that
> > you
> > > prefer it. Maybe we can even brainstorm some new ways to use Packet.
> I
> > mean,
> > > have at it if you want to. I just want to talk benefits not
> politics.
> > You
> > > are of course free to choose. Sorry again if you miss took my
> > question.
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:42:36 -0600
From: "Bud" <mircuser1234@yahoo.com>
Subject: What the heck is Packet radio good for anyway?
I'm sorry but that's simply the only response that I could come up with when
someone writes such garbage. He revealed himself as a 2-meter lid. Yes, that
does make me angry that people who feel free to trash something don't know
the first thing about it.
Jennifer <nomail@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:azSq4.9652$y15.98806@news3.mia...
> Now, now. But I see your point. Who said anything about 1200 baud? Who
said
> anything about even being on a frequency with others trying to use it? You
> CAN DO what is leagal. You SHOULD DO it if you want to. Any other rules do
> not apply.
>
> You obviousley have thought about this in a limited manner. When you say
> that you've seen the "frequency" go to pot, what frequency are you
speaking
> of? It certainly sounds as though you bellieve that packet is limited to
one
> frequency.
>
>
> Bud <mircuser1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CMEq4.12853$po2.138223@news1.mia...
> > You idiot.
> >
> > Billy (N5YSQ) <n5ysq@neto.com> wrote in message
> > news:ckBq4.1133$EO2.5990@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> > > I have a few negative comments to make on this subject, first of
all,
> I
> > > would think that all this is TRUE.
> > >
> > > Next of all, if packet radio is used for all this, at 1200 baud,
> reckon
> > > how MANY at the SAME TIME can use, if happened to be located in the
same
> > > general area..
> > >
> > > I have been a packet radio operator since I got my Ham Radio ticket,
and
> I
> > > have seen the freq go to POT for the very same things that this
fellow,
> > (no
> > > callsign that I saw) is talking about. so just because you CAN DO
> > certain
> > > things, does not mean you SHOULD DO these things on a 24 hour basis..
> > >
> > > This is just one person's opinion n5ysq 73's.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:37:18 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: What the heck is Packet radio good for anyway?
Moron Bud <mircuser1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:CMEq4.12853$po2.138223@news1.mia...
>
> You idiot.
You're the idiot. Billy had a valid point there, and you didn't. The fact
that your response to a call for basic responsibility in how we operate was
to call the person names tells us all we have to know about your character.
(And lack thereof)
Amateur Radio could do with a lot less people like you.
Take a hike.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>
> Billy (N5YSQ) <n5ysq@neto.com> wrote in message
> news:ckBq4.1133$EO2.5990@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> > I have a few negative comments to make on this subject, first of all,
I
> > would think that all this is TRUE.
> >
> > Next of all, if packet radio is used for all this, at 1200 baud,
reckon
> > how MANY at the SAME TIME can use, if happened to be located in the same
> > general area..
> >
> > I have been a packet radio operator since I got my Ham Radio ticket, and
I
> > have seen the freq go to POT for the very same things that this fellow,
> (no
> > callsign that I saw) is talking about. so just because you CAN DO
> certain
> > things, does not mean you SHOULD DO these things on a 24 hour basis..
> >
> > This is just one person's opinion n5ysq 73's.
> >
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:53:52 -0600
From: "Bud" <mircuser1234@yahoo.com>
Subject: What the heck is Packet radio good for anyway?
He didn't make a call for basic responsibility. He, and you, are completely
confused. I must have missed your appointment by the ARRL as the Amateur
Radio Police. Take a hike.
Charles Brabham <n5pvl@texoma.net> wrote in message
news:88gtiq1mgr@enews2.newsguy.com...
>
> Moron Bud <mircuser1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:CMEq4.12853$po2.138223@news1.mia...
> >
> > You idiot.
>
> You're the idiot. Billy had a valid point there, and you didn't. The fact
> that your response to a call for basic responsibility in how we operate
was
> to call the person names tells us all we have to know about your
character.
> (And lack thereof)
>
> Amateur Radio could do with a lot less people like you.
>
> Take a hike.
>
> --
>
> 73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
> N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
> http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>
>
> >
> > Billy (N5YSQ) <n5ysq@neto.com> wrote in message
> > news:ckBq4.1133$EO2.5990@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> > > I have a few negative comments to make on this subject, first of
all,
> I
> > > would think that all this is TRUE.
> > >
> > > Next of all, if packet radio is used for all this, at 1200 baud,
> reckon
> > > how MANY at the SAME TIME can use, if happened to be located in the
same
> > > general area..
> > >
> > > I have been a packet radio operator since I got my Ham Radio ticket,
and
> I
> > > have seen the freq go to POT for the very same things that this
fellow,
> > (no
> > > callsign that I saw) is talking about. so just because you CAN DO
> > certain
> > > things, does not mean you SHOULD DO these things on a 24 hour basis..
> > >
> > > This is just one person's opinion n5ysq 73's.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
To be continued in digest: pr_2000_40C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
