| |
VK6BE > NASA 02.10.03 00:57l 38 Lines 1538 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : A81421VK6BE
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Moonlanding - true or false?..
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<OE3XSR<OK0PBX<OK0PHK<OK0NAG<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<
SP7MGD<IK6PYS<VK3TE<VK6HGR<VK6BBR<VK6RAW<VK6PBV<VK6JY
Sent: 021202/0517Z @:VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC #:59954 [Albany] FBB7 $:A81421VK6BE
From: VK6BE@VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC
To : NASA@WW
Well I have read some rubbish on packet before but nothing that touches
this topic for absolute nonsense.
There WAS a moonlanding and there WERE amateurs involved, and I know one
of them who was in the thick of the moonlanding. The monitoring space
station covering this side of the globe was situated at Carnarvon in the
north of my state of Western Australia. and Chris Todd who was VK6CT at
the time was one of the staff. Anyway, he can speak for himself if he is
reading this, as he is on packet radio.The Carnarvon station covered this
side of the globe and was in constant touch with Houston, and with the
space exercise during the whole affair. Are you telling me that this very
expensive exercise was a fake designed for propaganda purposes?What
rubbish!!
To suggest, as has been done that the whole enterprise was a hoax is
absolutely ludicrous! Here's my other leg. Try pulling that too Kenny.
Bob VK6BE.
>
> Where there NO? Radio Amateurs around that time?
> Did none of them watch the Frequencies?
> (used for Moon- Earth-Orbiter)
> No (?) (!) HAM did monitor the Liftoff frequecies , no HAM
> did monitor the Traffic? NO HAM did report Traffic coming
> from the WRONG?!!! direction.
> NO HAM Involved whatsoever?
> Well, then ... , yes , it could be a very costly fake.
> A "Fake" that probably would cost more than the undertaking.
> Common you 'DUD's" Outta there, if NO HAM would have a
> shred of evidence
> But, knowing Packet , who cares...
> The Moon , Pah!!!
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
