| |
ZR6CPB > NASA 30.09.03 19:50l 36 Lines 1105 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 6C1866ZR6CPB
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Moonlanding - true or false?..
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0ACC<DB0MKA<DB0LJ<LX0HST<
HA3PG<7M3TJZ<F6BZU<F6BZU<TU2BB<ZS6FB<ZS0DLD<ZS0TFK<ZS0KLK
Sent: 021203/1730Z @:ZS0KLK.KLK.NWP.ZAF.AF #:57783 [Klerksdorp] $:6C1866ZR6CPB
From: ZR6CPB@ZS0KLK.KLK.NWP.ZAF.AF
To : NASA@WW
>> NO HAM Involved whatsoever?
>
> A few. Not many monitoring but there again just what equipment was in use
> for narrowband operation on S band in 1969? And how much of it was in ham
> hands?
>
> One QSL card was issued by NASA for successful reception of the command
> module.
>
> I know of at least one other ham who was monitoring... G7SLL worked in
> mission control, Houston. He was the "guy turning blue" when the Eagle
> landed and was monitoring the telemetry on behalf of NASA !
>>>>>>>>>> blah blah blah >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Every two years a Troll comes along and says: "The Moon Landing was a
Fake!"
Then he sits back, and watches the ignorants let rip with all sorts of wild
speculation. Boy, you gullible people never learn ....
Anyway, if you got half a decent telescope, you can see the leftovers.
Including the laser reflector gismo ...
You tell me how that got up there ... fedexpress?
If you compare the costs of the moonlanding, with the production of Star
Wars, you will know why NASA was to broke to fake it.
Chau.
Chrissi.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
