OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK6BE  > FUEL     05.03.08 14:17l 28 Lines 1127 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1B2105VK6BE
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re:Ethanol Issues VK6BE
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0IUZ<DB0GOS<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<F6CDD<F6BVP<
      VK2TV
Sent: 080305/1210Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:33507 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:1B2105VK
From: VK6BE@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To  : FUEL@WW


Well I don't know the details Barry of the points you mention.. My remark
was that it IS being used now and that it has been used for more years
than I can remember and that is going back to the 1930s.
It may be that the problems in distribution are not insurmountable.Existing
 tankers are certainly used here (Oops! that remark will bring a sneer
from Bonny Scotland I guess! Must not mention HERE!!).

Just curious - if it can't be put through pipelines how is it distributed
in the distillery now? In buckets? I am not joking - serious question.
Bob VK6BE.


> 
> There are distribution problems with ethanol. It cannot be put through piplines  and requires
specual tankers to deliver to  service stations.
> It also  rwuires 40  % more  tankers to  deliver it  due to  the lower energy  (KM/Ltr) content.
> 
> When mixed with petrol it does not pose the same problems I presume because I  think that existing
tankers are used.
> 
> Ian can probably answer that question.
> 
> What I said above is probably correct for E10 but E85 may well be a different  kettle of fish.


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 12.07.2026 21:13:40lGo back Go up