| |
VK2AAB > FUEL 01.03.12 10:10l 173 Lines 8851 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 5555_VK2AAB
Read: DK3UZ GUEST
Subj: Closing Refineries; Risk ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0EAM<DB0FC<DB0UHI<DB0OSN<DB0RES<DK0WUE<IK6ZDE<
VE3UIL<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<VK2AAB
Sent: 120228/2215Z @:VK2AAB.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC #:5555 [SYDNEY] $:5555_VK2AAB
From: VK2AAB@VK2AAB.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
To : FUEL@WW
As this article discusses there is an increased risk of the reliability of
supply as the refineries close. The UK is in the same boat, or should that be
in the same tanker ?
73 Barry VK2AAB
---------------------------------
Refining Australia's fuel security policy
27 Feb 2012 4:06 PM
The looming closure of three Australian refineries will affect the security of
liquid fuel supplies in Australia. This is particularly so if the government
and the oil industry do not devise a joint strategy with which to respond to
potential supply disruptions.
Last week, Caltex Australia wrote down the value of its two oil refineries
(Kurnell in NSW and Lytton in Queensland) by $1.5 billion. Caltex announced
that the results of an operational review due in six months could lead to
refinery closures.
The closure may mark another milestone in the decline of Australia's refining
sector. Shell confirmed in July last year that it will shut down refining
operations at Clyde and convert the Clyde Refinery and Gore Bay Terminal into a
fuel import facility by mid-2013. ExxonMobil's Port Stanvac refinery near
Adelaide was mothballed in 2003. In 2009, the decision was made to close down
the refinery.
More commentary
If an ongoing Caltex review results in closure of the two refineries, the
nation will be reduced to just four, half the number in 2003.
Caltex's position also raises questions over the viability of the nation's
four other refineries. Analysts often tout ExxonMobil's Altona refinery in
Melbourne as a candidate for divestment.
There is consensus among industry analysts that it is extremely unlikely there
will be any new major additions to Australia's refining capacity. In fact,
BP's chief economist Christof Ruhl described the future of the local refining
industry as “dire”.
Why are Australian refineries closing down?
All of the recent refinery closures have been attributed to the rise of huge
refineries in the Asian region, where a surge of new capacity has depressed
profit margins in the industry. The closures were not carbon tax-related.
Australia's refineries have experienced declining gross margins for several
years, mainly due to competition from foreign refineries, an oversupply of
refining capacity in Asia, and the high cost of transporting crude oil to
Australia.
Crude oil is transported in large tankers (VLCCs) – up to 200,000 tonnes.
Petroleum products are transported in much smaller ships – up to 45,000
tonnes. The freight (per barrel) is cheaper for crude oil via VLCCs. However,
this is eroded by the higher cost of refining in Australia which results from
smaller scale, higher capital costs, and higher wages and energy costs. Thus,
the key problem for Australian refiners is that the landed cost of crude oil in
Australia plus refining costs and a profit margin is higher than the landed
cost of petroleum products.
Refineries need a production capacity of at least 200,000 barrels per day (bpd)
in order to reach the minimum efficient scale. Australian refineries are small
in capacity compared with new refineries in Asia. For example, the world's
largest refinery (Jamnagar in India with the production capacity of 1,240,000
bpd, owned by Reliance Industries) could supply more than Australia's entire
yearly fuel demand.
As well as being comparatively small, Australia's oil refineries are old,
with the last refinery built in 1965. Consequently, they require large
investment for upgrade in line with evolving environmental standards.
Australia is not unique amongst developed countries in this regard. New oil
refineries have not been built in the US since 1976, with more than 30
refineries being closed in the last decade. The story is similar in the UK,
with the closure of ten refineries since the late 1970s. The majority of
closures have happened in OECD countries and this trend is likely to continue.
The prospects for Australian refineries depend on competitive conditions set by
global refinery circumstances. The Australian refining industry operates in an
internationally competitive market, with large refinery capacity existing in
Asia capable of exporting substantial volumes of fuel to Australia. In this
context, importing refined fuel from Asian mega-refineries, such as Reliance
Industry's Jamnagar, ExxonMobil's Singapore refinery or Shell's Singapore
refinery is more cost-effective for oil companies.
How do refinery closures affect Australia's energy security?
The total demand for petroleum products in Australia is 941,000 bpd.
Consumption of refined petroleum products is projected to grow 1.2 per cent a
year over the long term.
Future reductions in refining capacity in Australia (from current 761,500 bpd
to 433,000 bpd if only four refineries remain operational) and growth in demand
imply that imports will play an increasingly greater role in meeting domestic
demand.
According to an Australian Strategic Policy Institute report, the fact that
domestic oil production and refining capacity falls short of local demand means
that Australia is, at least to some extent, vulnerable to the disruption of
supplies of crude and refined petroleum products during times of crisis.
According to the former managing director of Caltex Australia, Des King:
“Retaining a substantial oil refining capability is essential to Australia's
energy security.” The closure of domestic refineries will not improve
Australia's energy security in liquid fuels.
Future reductions in Australian refining capacity, coupled with higher levels
of demand for liquid fuels, will result in the elimination of spare refining
capacity. Domestic refineries will have limited scope to increase production or
divert export cargoes into the domestic market in the event of a breakdown.
Replacing domestic production losses with imported product may take time to
deliver due to the longer supply chains associated with imported petroleum
products.
Domestic refineries provide a much greater degree of flexibility in the product
supply chain in the event of an unexpected supply disruption. For example, as
the major source of imported refined petroleum products to Australia, the loss
of refining capacity in Singapore could be the source of significant product
shortages in Australia.
The closure of domestic refineries will make Australia more dependent on
overseas refiners who may be less responsive to the needs of their Australian
customers than would be the case with a domestic refiner. It will also reduce
the diversification of supply options available for Australia.
What has been the government's reaction to closures?
The Australian government recognised in its 2008 National Energy Security
Assessment, that liquid fuel security will decline significantly if the future
viability of Australian refineries is challenged and more Australian refineries
close.
Yet, as with broader energy policy, the federal government has adopted a
laissez faire approach to refining. It does not consider refinery closures as a
threat to security of fuel supply.
According to the government's Draft Energy White Paper, a growing reliance on
liquid fuel imports is not considered to impair long term liquid fuel security
due to our ability to import an adequate and reliable supply of liquid fuels
through well-established and diverse international supply chains.
In a statement following Shell's decision to shut down the Clyde refinery,
Federal Minister for Resources Martin Ferguson said the future of the refinery
was a commercial matter for Shell and he didn't have concerns about security
of supply.
Yet, analysts suggest that a major disruption to Australia's oil refining
industry would have major consequences not only for the industry but also on
society and the economy as a whole. Accordingly, the government and the
industry are not adequately prepared to respond to or recover from major
disaster or disruption. A substantial reduction in Australia's refining
capacity will cause a major shift in Australia's liquid fuels supply chain
and may have significant security implications if supply disruptions arise.
While the government may not change its laissez faire approach to the refining
industry, the possible implications of the decline of Australia's refining
industry require detailed scrutiny in Canberra.
At the very least, a major review of government's petroleum supply security
policy, and industry's preparedness to deal with potential supply
disruptions, is in order as part of the 2014 National Energy Security
Assessment process.
Vlad Vivoda is Research Fellow with Griffith Asia Institute at Griffith
University. This story first appeared on The Conversation. Reproduced with
permission. 27 Feb 2012 4:06 PM
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
