OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK6BE  > FUEL     23.12.08 05:17l 21 Lines 931 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 090935VK6BE
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK6BE > Alternative fuels
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<HB9EAS<DB0ZAV<HS1LMV<7M3TJZ<DK0WUE<F4BWT<F6BVP<
      VK2TV
Sent: 081223/0255Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:51337 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:090935VK
From: VK6BE@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To  : FUEL@WW


Professor Warren speaking! So the scientists are wrong and you are right?
Come on,. Warren, you don't know everything. Someone else must be right
some of the time. BTW the sacrifice of efficiency is not noticeable in
actual practice. The efficiency of autogas is supposed to be down 10% but
it makes no noticeable difference to my engine performance. I have a
switch on the dash which will change from one to the other instantly, no
change in speed or pulling power is detectable.

Your theory  is a direct contradiction of the opinion others who can
really claim to be experts in the field. Sorry, you lose!
Bob VK6BE.

>he only advantage if you can call it that ethanol has is reducing our 
dependence on oil but at the sacrifice of fuel efficiency. Some 
advantage, burn more and produce more CO2, yet the greenies love it. To 
borrow an English phrase, funny ol' wuld iddnit?


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 20.06.2026 07:12:16lGo back Go up