OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
N1URO  > JNOS2    25.11.19 12:22l 57 Lines 2333 Bytes #-2344 (0) @ WW
BID : 95422_AA6HF
Read: DF7EAV DJ6UX GUEST
Subj: Re: This BID thing and DUPES and stuff
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FFL<OE5XBL<F1OYP<F4DUR<LU4ECL<VK4TUB<ZL2BAU<N9PMO<GB7YEW<
      GB7CIP<AA6HF<N2NOV<AA6HF<N1URO
Sent: 191102/1317Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:33472 [Unionville] $:33472_N1URO

>From n1uro%n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam@n2nov.ampr.org Sat Nov  2 09:21:18 2019
Received: from n2nov.ampr.org by n2nov.ampr.org ([JNOS]) with SMTP
	id AA819754 ; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 09:21:18 EDT
Message-Id: <33472_N1URO@aa6hf.bbs>
>From: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Uplink   (AA6HF-8 on port axip5)  -> Sending message

From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
To  : JNOS2@WW


Gus et al;

> All true the above statement, but...

> the management of two/three PBBS require for me some mental
> efforts for doing the things well.

So if I may paraphrase here since we both run more than 2 BBS,
we're not the norm here :) Most people run only 1 BBS thus their requirements
for what they do aren't as complex as they would be for you or I. Even I had
to code in a patch so that JNOS would accept locally written B and P mail from
my LinFBB. The No BID patch that I supplied Maiko works for the average sysop.

> The use of 8192 (alone) with an associated password have on
> JNOS2 the benefit to allow to obcm, linfbb, dptnt etc to
> have a perhaps more safe login and forwarding.

I'm confused. Please explain the nature of this statement? There's only 2 things
currently that this does in xNOS that I'm aware of:
- Forces just a SID and ">" prompt
- now forces a BID when sending mail (which makes for safer forwarding).
What other "safer" logins and forwarding do you get from this?

> Note that my site is continually targeted by big government
> and research/industrial hackers, so I can't release my hands
> with a User setup.

So you're using straight telnet - a plain text protocol to forward with in
which any government, research/industrial cracker (a hacker is someone who
improves up on a program for the better of it. A cracker is someone who
breaks into things like a safe cracker (-: ) can sniff out your information.
We have a saying here: Locks are only meant to keep honest people honest.
Rather than using telnet forwarding, why not use netrom or
ax.25 level forwarding? Then you don't expose a password in plain text.
Security by obscurity is better than no security whatsoever. You can then
even give  yourself perm level of 63 and a BID won't be required until a SID
is sent... to which if it's your LinFBB or OpenBCM it should send a SID upon
connect. :)

73 de N1URO
---
SendBBS v1.1 by N1URO for LinFBB





Read previous mail | Read next mail


 29.04.2026 02:41:49lGo back Go up