| |
I0OJJ > JNOS2 25.11.19 11:43l 58 Lines 1385 Bytes #-2345 (0) @ WW
BID : 95367_AA6HF
Read: DF7EAV DJ6UX GUEST
Subj: JNOS2 2.0M (beta) Oct 29, 2019
Path: DB0FHN<OE2XZR<OE5XBL<OE5XBR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<CX2SA<OK2PEN<GB7CIP<AA6HF<
N2NOV<GB7CIP<ON0AR<DB0RES<IR2UBX<IW2OHX<IR1UAW<I0OJJ
Sent: 191031/1022z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:30739 $:705f2_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj%i0ojj.ita.eu@n2nov.ampr.org Thu Oct 31 06:31:10 2019
Received: from n2nov.ampr.org by n2nov.ampr.org ([JNOS]) with SMTP
id AA817021 ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:31:10 EDT
Message-Id: <705F2_I0OJJ@gb7cip.bbs>
>From: i0ojj@i0ojj.ita.eu
X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (CIPOUT:GB7CIP-13 GB7CIP) -> Sending message
Hi Maiko and all,
a new bug was introduced on the subject 'beta' release:
in practice it is not possible anymore to upload any msgs
with any address to JNOS2.
The following example (a.) shows the uploaded format
and the JNOS2 replies.
In b. is reported the JNOS2 log released.
I want to specify that no troubles was experienced on
previous JNOS2 versions.
a. sending failure
------------------
> sb hroute@ww < i0ojj
> WP Update
> On 191031 IR0AAB/U @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU zip 00034 Gustavo Rome
> On 191031 I0OJJ/U @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU zip 00034 Gus Rome
> /EX
NO - No BID!
>
User not in whitepages! If local user, try "ML user"...
>
>
Huh?
>
Huh?
>
Huh?
>
-----------
b. JNOS2 log
------------
10:29:03 I0OJJ-4 on port hub - MBOX (i0ojj) open
10:29:26 I0OJJ-4 on port hub - MBOX (i0ojj) incoming proposal sB
hroute@ww < i0ojj
10:29:26 I0OJJ-4 on port hub - MBOX i0ojj: SB without BID - hroute@ww
10:30:56 I0OJJ-4 on port hub - mbxrecvline timed out
10:30:56 I0OJJ-4 on port hub - MBOX (i0ojj) exit
-----------
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
