| |
GW3TMH > INFO 22.07.02 10:21l 49 Lines 1284 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : GW3TMH002253
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re:MONITORS! TFT or CRT?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0HDF<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<IK1ZNW<HR2PAQ<
WB0TAX<N1UAN<VE9EMO
Sent: 020722/0430z @:VE9EMO.#FRED.NB.CAN.NOAM [TNOS2.30*LINUX] $:GW3TMH002253
I use one all the time, the colours are not as good as the old CRT though.
and it is confusing that the colours change as your viewing angle changes
so you can tweek it to look perfect, change your seating position and it
is not perfect anymore.
great for text, but not really on for image (photo) work.
(mine's a sony)
Ken
>From: G4WYW@GB7SOU.#48.GBR.EU
>To : INFO@GBR
>
>
>Hello and thanks for reading this message.
>
>I have, for some time, considered buying a flat screen TFT monitor.
>
>These usually run at 60hz whereas the SVGA CRT type I currently use
>runs at 80hz.
>
>Apart from the space saving of the flat screen TFT's, I understand that
>they are virtually flicker free and are free from glare as well as being
>unaffected by Pin cushioning and Moire.
>
>Maximum resolution of the TFT types seems to be 1280 x 1024 whereas some
>CRT types can go up to 1600 x 1200.
>
>Basically, I'm asking, have you used the TFT Flat screen type of monitor
>and if so, what did/do you think of them. Are they worth the high price
>that is being asked?
>
>Answers as a bulletin please.
>
>Thanks you...
>
>
>73 - Mel, G4WYW @ GB7SOU.#48.GBR.EU
>
>Message timed: 22:41 UTC on 19 Jul 02
>Message sent using Winpack 6.80 (R)
From: gw3tmh at gb7abc.freeserve.co.uk (Using HamServ)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
