OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
2E0PZT > INFO     20.07.02 18:58l 43 Lines 1396 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : F600242E0PZT
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: 2E0PZT > Outlook Distress
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0CHZ<OK0PKL<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<GB7YKS<GB7ESX
Sent: 020720/1513z 74896@GB7ESX.#31.GBR.EU $:F600242E0PZT [Witham, Esx]NNA V3.1

Hello Warren and others...

Warren KB2VXA wrote:

> Being you asked a specific question of a specific person, why did you
> not send SP rather than WW?

Then I would have got only 1 (biased?) response. The other reason was
for this simple reason...

> Outlook Express is no more vulnerable than any Microsuck product.

> Gates simply is the target, his product the means.
> The simple solution to attack problems is in thier proper
> and sometimes clever use, but most important for ANY computing system
> on line is a FIREWALL.

Thankyou, Warren for you input. That's what I was hoping for, a reply
from somebody who may have a totally different angle of approach.

I use Norton Firewall + Antivirus (all updated).

Warren continued:

> Download and use ZoneAlarm, it's free and works very well. It keeps the 
> bogeyman from MY back door. Just remember to properly configure it like 
> any firewall and anti virus software.

Have heard good reports about that, so I must have a look.

            _________________________________________

            Charlie Davy 2E0PZT @ GB7ESX.#31.GBR.EU
            _________________________________________

            Chelmsford, Essex JO01FS  QRV: HF to 70cm

            P3 450 - Win ME - WinPack v6.80 - BSX TNC
            Packet: 433.650   5w to an 8ele vert yagi

            Sent at 16:06 on Jul-20
            using the excellent WinPack v6.80


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 26.07.2026 04:30:31lGo back Go up