| |
2E0PZT > INFO 20.07.02 18:58l 43 Lines 1396 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : F600242E0PZT
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: 2E0PZT > Outlook Distress
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0CHZ<OK0PKL<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<GB7YKS<GB7ESX
Sent: 020720/1513z 74896@GB7ESX.#31.GBR.EU $:F600242E0PZT [Witham, Esx]NNA V3.1
Hello Warren and others...
Warren KB2VXA wrote:
> Being you asked a specific question of a specific person, why did you
> not send SP rather than WW?
Then I would have got only 1 (biased?) response. The other reason was
for this simple reason...
> Outlook Express is no more vulnerable than any Microsuck product.
> Gates simply is the target, his product the means.
> The simple solution to attack problems is in thier proper
> and sometimes clever use, but most important for ANY computing system
> on line is a FIREWALL.
Thankyou, Warren for you input. That's what I was hoping for, a reply
from somebody who may have a totally different angle of approach.
I use Norton Firewall + Antivirus (all updated).
Warren continued:
> Download and use ZoneAlarm, it's free and works very well. It keeps the
> bogeyman from MY back door. Just remember to properly configure it like
> any firewall and anti virus software.
Have heard good reports about that, so I must have a look.
_________________________________________
Charlie Davy 2E0PZT @ GB7ESX.#31.GBR.EU
_________________________________________
Chelmsford, Essex JO01FS QRV: HF to 70cm
P3 450 - Win ME - WinPack v6.80 - BSX TNC
Packet: 433.650 5w to an 8ele vert yagi
Sent at 16:06 on Jul-20
using the excellent WinPack v6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |