| |
VK6BE > PC 18.03.05 16:49l 34 Lines 1289 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 550029VK6BE
Read: GUEST DC9BM
Subj: Re: Politically correct madness ag
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0FHK<DB0ACC<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<VK6HGR<VK6ZSE<
VK6TJ<VK6JY
Sent: 050318/0143Z @:VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC #:55574 [Albany] wFBB7 $:550029VK6B
From: VK6BE@VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC
To : PC@WW
Yes, David.Right on!
I should have made my point clearer in that this is NOT, repeat NOT,
degenderising the language it is a direct REVERSAL of roles putting the
man into one role and the woman into another neither of whom might be
happy at the reversal.It is therefore not politically correct at all.
I find that the loudest critics of this lunacy are the women themselves,
most of whom don't want a role reversal but are happy to be female,
feminine and cherished.
This bulletin must not be taken as support for male chauvinism. I don't
believe in that either.There is a place in society for men and women to
choose their own role, and there should be no forcing of them into one
role or the other, which is what the modern luantics are trying to do.
And what an UGLY language they are creating! Humankind, tradesperson,
craftsperson waitperson,chairperson, what else? YUCK!!!
Bob VK6BE
>Yet another reason as to why so many young people of today are mixed up?
>73 David.
>From: VK6BE@VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC
>To : PC@WW
>
>
>Barry, as early as twenty years ago West Australian Schools used picture
>books which showed the men doing the cooking and housework while the
>ladies chopped the wood and "fixed" the car. Reversed roles.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
