| |
G0FTD > HELP 22.11.04 02:57l 40 Lines 1321 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : FB0127G0FTD
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: KB2VXA and forwarding
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0IUZ<DB0PRA<ON0RET<DB0RES<ER3KAZ<
R3CR<UR6IUG<UX0IXI<SP7MGD<7M3TJZ<ZL2TZE<GB7YFS<GB7MAX<GB7COV<GB7COV<
GB7CIP<GB7SXE
Sent: 041121/1805Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:13565 [Hastings] FBB7.00i $:FB0127G0FT
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To : HELP@WW
G0SYR wrote:-
> Hi Warren and all,
>
> Many thanks for your reply, I hope you won't mind me replying as a
> bulletin as I think its important that as many people as possible
> understand the situation as it's obvious that you do believe what
> you say although its based on complete myth.
> Remember we are talking about bulletins forwarded @WW
I don't see Warren's bulletins but may I make a small comment.
The USA seems to have a big problem with personal mail - because many
US stations (and VE's) tell me this.
I think one good way of sniffing out bad routes is for all sysops to
install the FBB ACK server and PING server. If there's a network fault
or bad routes etc then the lack of an ack often shows them up.
Bryan and his local sysop are well aware of it's potential as I often
QSO them etc.
However not all bbs' appear to run these servers and coupled with the
US using everything from FBB and W0RLI stuff and even MSYS stuff so
the potential for problems to be unoticed are far greater e.g I *think*
only FBB software supports ack/ping servers.
Funny how the rest of the world seems to cope OK with FBB and the lack
of a software writer's vested interest or personal agenda.
Nuff sed.
73 - Andy, G0FTD @ GB7SXE
Message timed: 17:51 on 2004-Nov-21
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
