OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
PA2AGA > HDDIG    12.10.00 02:03l 187 Lines 6177 Bytes #-8619 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_276B
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/276B
Path: DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0SEL<DB0RBS<DB0PSC<DB0ACH<DB0ACC<ON0RAT<ON5VL<
      LX0HST<HA3PG<IK1ZNW<EA7URC<PE1NMB<PI8WFL<PI8HGL
Sent: 001011/1327Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:23950 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_276B
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To  : HDDIG@EU
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 00 14:37:02 MET

Message-Id: <hd_2000_276B>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B

-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 19:52:52 -0400
From: "Bob Lewis" <rlewis@staffnet.com>
Subject: No waterfall - what am I doing wrong??

All I can tell you is that I've run WinPSK, WinPSKse, DigiPan, Logger,
Zanlanka, and the original PSKsb program without a problem on a number
of straight Windows 98 machines.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 04:15:48 GMT
From: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Subject: No waterfall - what am I doing wrong??

Zero problems with either under 98SE . . . or with any other of the
soundcard-based digital programs such as Zakanaka, MMTTY, etc.

72/73, George   W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas      NETXQRP        
Fairview, TX   30 mi NE Dallas in Collin county      QRP-L 1373
Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 55th year and it just keeps getting better!
Icom IC-756 PRO #02121 (9/00) Kachina #91900556 (12/99) IC-765 (6/90)


Jim Pennino wrote:

> Under 98, I have (so far) tried WinPSKse and DigiPan.
> 
> WinPSKse runs fine immediatly after an install. If you quit the program then
> re-run it, all sorts of flaky things happen; sometimes it won't receive,
> sometimes it won't transmit. If you delete all the registry entries for it,
> it will run fine until you exit the program again.
> 
> I have never gotten DigiPan to receive anything or show any sign that it is
> listening or talking to the sound card.
> 
> Keep in mind this is the same hardware in all cases.
> 
> Jim Pennino

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 23:44:36 GMT
From: Dick Hughes <dhughes33@earthlink.net>
Subject: PSK31 Reflector - Where Did It Go?

Anyone else having a problem with the PSK-31 reflector.  Everything I
send bounces, and nothing is coming this direction.

Dick Hughes - W6CCD
Change 33 to 55 in address

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 14:22:22 -0500
From: Marvin Volz <mtve@hal-pc.org>
Subject: Softw. MFJ 1278B ?

MJF has 1289W for Windows @
http://www.mfjenterprises.com/software/mfj1289.html
Not sure if it's been updated since 1993.

Yes, you can use other software, authors usually indicate what TNCs will work.

W5MTV


Gerrit Vinke wrote:

> Hi TNX for reading,
>
> I recently bought a TNC MFJ 1278B together with the original software (mfj
> 1289).
>
> Does anyone know if I can also use other software on this modem?
> And if so where to find it ??
>
> Tnx  de PA3DWC, Gerrit

------------------------------

Date: 08 Oct 2000 15:09:01 GMT
From: n8blk@aol.com (Art Clemons)
Subject: wireless PDA hacking

In article <u%SD5.1711$GA1.105722@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Hank
Oredson" <horedson@att.net> writes:

>Perhaps you should try reading Part 97 more carefully, the sections
>about permitted transmission.

I have carefully.  The entire point is that for example, one can now order a
pizza using an autopatch if one has no financial interest in the pizza
business.  Once behavior like that was banned, but now it isn't.  It's also a
joke as I have yet to hear a pizza or similar item ordered over an autopatch. 
Similarly, we could have this discussion on packet radio despite having
internet access as far as I can tell.  Of course the reliability of messages
getting through would be less.  If you're correct, then packet radio for the
most part shouldn't exist at all except for things like APRS.  Reading your
interpretation literally, most of amateur radio shouldn't exist.  

I understand the difference between commercial interest and no commercial
interest.
Looking at 97.111, 97.113, 97.115, 97.117, and 97.121, I don't see what you're
claiming.  Which section are you claiming should be applicable?  I understand
also the prohibition on REGULAR transmissions if there is another available
service, but you imply a total ban, which doesn't exist.
-art clemons-

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 17:37:00 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: wireless PDA hacking

"Art Clemons" <n8blk@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001008110901.20823.00000052@nso-de.aol.com...
> In article <u%SD5.1711$GA1.105722@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Hank
> Oredson" <horedson@att.net> writes:
>
> >Perhaps you should try reading Part 97 more carefully, the sections
> >about permitted transmission.
>
> I have carefully.  The entire point is that for example, one can now order a
> pizza using an autopatch if one has no financial interest in the pizza
> business.

Read about automatic control and third party messages.
The topic was handling internet email via ham radio.

> Once behavior like that was banned, but now it isn't.  It's also a
> joke as I have yet to hear a pizza or similar item ordered over an
autopatch.
> Similarly, we could have this discussion on packet radio despite having
> internet access as far as I can tell.  Of course the reliability of messages
> getting through would be less.  If you're correct, then packet radio for the
> most part shouldn't exist at all except for things like APRS.  Reading your
> interpretation literally, most of amateur radio shouldn't exist.
>
> I understand the difference between commercial interest and no commercial
> interest.
> Looking at 97.111, 97.113, 97.115, 97.117, and 97.121, I don't see what
you're
> claiming.  Which section are you claiming should be applicable?  I
understand
> also the prohibition on REGULAR transmissions if there is another available
> service, but you imply a total ban, which doesn't exist.

I implied no such thing.

The topic was the regular handling of internet email via ham radio, to
avoid the use of a common carrier internet connection.

> -art clemons-



--

   ...  Hank

http://horedson.home.att.net

------------------------------

End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #276
******************************

You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net)  to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu





Read previous mail | Read next mail


 18.05.2024 15:34:20lGo back Go up