| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 03.10.00 23:36l 210 Lines 6960 Bytes #-8627 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_269C
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/269C
Path: DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0SEL<DB0RBS<DB0PSC<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 001003/1811Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:21076 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_269C
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 00 19:16:49 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_269C>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Use policy states:
IF TIME WARNER DETERMINES THAT THE SUBSCRIBER HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE
SERVICE'S STANDARDS OF CONDUCT OR LIMITS ON BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION, TIME WARNER
MAY SUSPEND SUBSCRIBER'S ACCOUNT. TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SHALL HAVE THE
SOLE AND UNREVIEWABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHETHER CONTENT VIOLATES THESE
STANDARDS.
Why does Time Warner have the SOLE AND UNREVIEWABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHETHER
CONTENT VIOLATES THEIR STANDARDS? Why can't I post comment based on MY
standards, not theirs? And, when I purchase UNLIMITED SERVICE, why can they
then establish bandwith limitations? Is this unlimited service? Is not a
company required to deliver what the customer pays for?
I regularly correspond with users from many foreign countries. Their ISP's
cannot control their speech. Why does not an American citizen have at least
the same freedom of speech as do the citizens of foreign countries? We taught
them the value and power of freedom of speech. Must they now teach us how to
avoid its death at the hands of commercial mega-corporations concerned only
with their sale of "content?"
If AOL and Time Warner are allowed to take over the responsibility of deciding
who can say what to whom, how will you return the internet to its stated
purpose of a media of public discourse? How will you put the genie back in
the bottle? How will you explain to me why my viewpoint is so offensive that
I must be barred from the internet?
I sincerely entreat you to consider me, and all other citizen users of the
internet. Please, when you make your decision, insure that I can continue to
use the internet, and specifically that high speed access will not be denied
to me based upon the quantity or content of my speech.
pkslqlonxdzzgcrijqkmkksxykcuqlvhejwdebdspirclfzjioeltrusklymqkhclomrjxbczqgymed
ehuikioldkcdqnxgozbljjqtktemxmknmwivqhnbvolknloelnwsnispmnwihpnodtfomudzsonukou
knrbdjksbdx
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 02:16:46 GMT
From: desconocidos@wanadoo.es
Subject: New WEB linux win Mac 1701
www.cambiaelchip.com
eh men look at this
www.geocities.com/cmbchip
view
Sorry this web under construction but I can see
ooohh my god.... wwwcambiaelchip.com
tevncixrnsbubnpghhfivljdbkbmwngidotcbihpunqyoxoxrujiencxijtktvcnqyduyumfkprdjso
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:40:11 -0400
From: "Paolo" <N1XOI@arrl.net>
Subject: PSK31 ON 50MHz - BOSTON AREA -
Hello, fellow PSK31 operators,
anybody interested in experimenting with PSK31 on 50.290 in the Boston area?
It is a shame that 6 meters are mostly crowded only during voice contests
few times a year or in occasion of big propagation openings.
If you would like to give it a try, please reply to this posting or e-mail
me at N1XOI@arrl.net I can be on the air during weekends or late evening on
weekdays. Thanks!
Paolo, N1XOI.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 09:16:41 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson \(K5OKC\)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net>
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
> You might say an airplane can't fly because the laws of gravity or
> physics will not allow it. This was the belief. Not to mention the
> sound barrier. Now these amazing feats would appear as magic and
> unbeleivable to our nay saying forfathers.
Your spam machine needs a spell corrector.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:17:33 +0100
From: "Luciano Almeida" <lmalmeida@remove-me.netc.pt>
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
Hello.
Me again....
Do you have a link? So far I was unable to find the site...
And US$300 by node, is portuguese economy is quite a lot, but i may give a
try... right now is't about 60.000$00 (PT Escudos), or almost the national
minimum wage, but hell, let's give it a try.
Luciano Almeida
"Michael Hart" <mhart-NOSPAM@terrigal.net.au> wrote in message
news:39d697e5@turakina.six.asn.au...
>
> Rob Janssen wrote in message ...
> >Gary Coffman <ke4zv@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>I know that's more than you wanted to spend, but these modems
> >>do 115 kb bidirectional, and don't require a license to operate.
> >
> >License requirements of course are country-specific...
> >
> >Rob
>
>
> So are dollars - which is why I cannot get a fast packet modem at present.
> The kits sell for around $270US (not including the relevant transverters).
> This would be just feasable for me if it was Australian dollars but since
> the US is the only country doing well in the world our dollar has dropped
so
> these modems would cost about $500 Australian.
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 02:02:48 GMT
From: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Subject: radio link between 2 PCs
Spoken like a true, experienced Free-bander . . .
This is an amateur radio NG and amateurs are bound by law and moral
conduct to obey FCC regulations.
Afraid that you are trying to preach to the wrong choir here.
72/73, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE Dallas in Collin county QRP-L 1373
Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 55th year and it just keeps getting better!
Icom IC-756 PRO #02121 (9/00) Kachina #91900556 (12/99) IC-765 (6/90)
helpfull@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > If enough hams start doing it, the
> > FCC will probably just change the rules to allow it, or start another
> > service that will allow it. The public are being FOOLS for paying
> huge
> > initial equipment costs, and $40/month for wireless Internet service.
> >
> > ------- Stewart - N0MHS --------
> > Wireless High-Speed Networking and
> > Public Radio Services Information(MURS,FRS,GMRS,ARS,CB):
> > http://www.pubcel.com
> >
>
> HERE, HERE! I agree with this. This is what I'm saying. I hope you
> people read this. I hope you get the point. I hope all hams consider
> this wisdom as to the "rules". let's show them what Hams are made of!
> Don't you know if we could start providing some real benifits (both on
> or off the Ham bands) people would take notice? What could be better
> for Ham radio's future?
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:54:50 -0400
From: Joe Leikhim <jleikhim@nettally.com>
Subject: Test, don't bother looking
I told you.
--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
Jleikhim@nettally.com
"tv dinner by the pool,
i'm so glad i finished school" -F.Zappa 1967
"The Revolution will NOT be televised" -Gil Scott Heron
Dopeler effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they
come
at you rapidly.
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #269
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
