| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 23.09.00 23:10l 256 Lines 7658 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_257E
Read: DC1TMA GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/257E
Path: DB0AAB<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0ROF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<
PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 000923/2027Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:17227 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_257E
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 00 19:42:15 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_257E>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
the output frequency over a few KHz range. True DC coupling of the
modulation. I was also able to replace a series capacitor in the RUH modem
with a wire bridge, and have never seen such a nice eye pattern on the
scope. It looked just the same as a local loopback, no "jittering" and all
lines going through a very small crossing area.
Rob
--
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWW: http://www.knoware.nl/users/rob |
| AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
e) wireless 9600 baud network? Now
> 9600
> > > don't sound so bad do it? TCP/IP anyone? Stick that in your
> > > cellular "wirless-web". :) This Inovation can play a big part in
> > > keeping our bands!
> > >
> > > Hams do it mobile. :)
> > >
> > > 73
> >
> > ------- Stewart - N0MHS --------
> > Wireless High-Speed Networking and
> > Public Radio Services Information(MURS,FRS,GMRS,ARS,CB):
> > http://www.pubcel.com
> >
> >
>
> Thank you for the help. It was nice of you.
>
> What trans delay do I need? About what speed in ms, I mean? It seems
> most fairly new rigs are quick. Let me find a spec. Didn't find it but
> I think it's about 200ms.
At 9600, you would like 80 ms. or better. The little TEKK rigs can
do 50 ms. I find that many synthesized radios can actually manage
100-120 ms. without problem (e.g. tm-421).
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:25:21 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
"Rob Janssen" <nomail@rob.knoware.nl> wrote in message
news:slrn8se35k.qv.nomail@linux.pe1chl.ampr.org...
> Hank Oredson <horedson@att.net> wrote:
>
> >"Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in message
> >news:ssdjsbil3eh438@corp.supernews.com...
> >> Go back and read the first reply. The information you want was
> >> clearly given, and is located at ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/hamradio
>
> >The simple answer (which Steve could have provided, but he's lazy):
>
> >Contact KD1CA. If you can't get hold of him,
> >send an email to brian@ucsd.edu asking for help.
>
> I think it is rude to suggest bothering brian for things that can be solved
> by simple FTP.
Many of the US coordinators are no longer active, do not reply
to requests or can no longer be found at all. This is the situation,
for example, in 44.26. What should one do in that case, other
than "bother Brian". I think it is quite rude to give someone only
partial and incomplete information.
> I already posted the URL: ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/hamradio/amprnets
> Apparently mister HAM did not read that or he killfiled me. Too bad.
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:07:45 GMT
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Steve Sampson (K5OKC) wrote:
> "Hank Oredson" says:
> > The simple answer (which Steve could have provided, but he's lazy):
>
> With my answer he can fish, with yours he only gets one meal.
>
> Since most new IP enthusiasts only last a few days, I generally just
> recommend they pick any IP address above 64 in their states octet,
> as those addresses are not coordinated in the U.S.
..But that is NOT advised in my area (Los Angeles), and I believe that in
parts of Ohio, such numbers are also assigned.....
The Los Angeles area does have coordinated IP addresses with the third octet
being greater than 64 in value. Such was done before Brian changed the rules.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:04:34 GMT
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
On 19 Sep 2000, HAM kb1ddi wrote:
> Simple question, hopefully a simple answer. Would someone be kind enough to
> "email" infomation as to how I can get my HAM TCP/IP address. MY last post
> degenerated it to a bar room brawl. :-)
> Thanks
> My email address is Hamkb1ddi@aol.com
..And I told you to go the UCSD FTP site. One of the files there has as its
contents the list of people for each region who actually issues the IP
addresses for that region.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 18:29:01 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson \(K5OKC\)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
"Hank Oredson" says:
>
> Many of the US coordinators are no longer active, do not reply
> to requests or can no longer be found at all. This is the situation,
> for example, in 44.26. What should one do in that case, other
> than "bother Brian".
Just replace the 44 with a 10. Works fine.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 01:05:13 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
"Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in message
news:ssftmimt4ec8ff@corp.supernews.com...
> "Hank Oredson" says:
> >
> > Many of the US coordinators are no longer active, do not reply
> > to requests or can no longer be found at all. This is the situation,
> > for example, in 44.26. What should one do in that case, other
> > than "bother Brian".
>
> Just replace the 44 with a 10. Works fine.
For what?
Does Brian handle net 10 now?
Is it in amprhosts?
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:56:15 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson" <S.Sampson@radio-link.net>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
I don't think Brian handles anything now eh?
The object is to link radios. If you're never going to hook it to
the Internet (Chuckles says this is Bad! ...bad, bad...) then who
really gives a squat eh?
I think your BBS club is a proponent of non-wireline, so WTFO eh?
Pick a number, get all your club members to use it, "be happy..." eh?
amprhosts is for Internet routing. If you are against that, then what's
wrong with using 10, 192.168, 45, or even 24 eh?
Are you saying it is alright to hook Ham radio up to the Internet eh?
> > Just replace the 44 with a 10. Works fine.
>
> For what?
>
> Does Brian handle net 10 now?
> Is it in amprhosts?
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 05:31:38 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net>
Subject: TCP/IP Address 2
"Steve Sampson" <S.Sampson@radio-link.net> wrote in message
news:ssgdk59etfd57a@corp.supernews.com...
Drunk again, eh?
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
n5pvl@swbell.net
http://home.swbell.net/n5pvl/
> I don't think Brian handles anything now eh?
>
> The object is to link radios. If you're never going to hook it to
> the Internet (Chuckles says this is Bad! ...bad, bad...) then who
> really gives a squat eh?
>
> I think your BBS club is a proponent of non-wireline, so WTFO eh?
> Pick a number, get all your club members to use it, "be happy..." eh?
>
> amprhosts is for Internet routing. If you are against that, then what's
> wrong with using 10, 192.168, 45, or even 24 eh?
>
> Are you saying it is alright to hook Ham radio up to the Internet eh?
>
> > > Just replace the 44 with a 10. Works fine.
> >
> > For what?
> >
> > Does Brian handle net 10 now?
> > Is it in amprhosts?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #257
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
