| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 20.06.00 03:49l 263 Lines 7117 Bytes #-9436 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_169J
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/169J
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0BRI<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<
PI8GCB<PI8WNO<PI8HGL
Sent: 000619/1847Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:53014 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_169J
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 00 17:50:59 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_169J>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
--
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWW: http://www.knoware.nl/users/rob |
| AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:03:25 GMT
From: TomR@astro.net
Subject: PSK31 for FD??
On 17 Jun 2000 03:28:30 GMT, ebruchac@aol.comnojunkma (Ed Bruchac )
wrote:
>Anyone planning on running PSK31 for Field Day next weekend? Any suggestions
>for best band to work?
I'll be using it. 20 meters will no doubt be the best band to work.
It seems to be the most used band for that mode right now. 14.069.5
73,
Tom - KB2SMS
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:37:12 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@pacbell.net>
Subject: PSK31 for FD??
K6AA will be running PSK31 on 40M.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:44:52 GMT
From: TomR@astro.net
Subject: PSK31 program for the Palm pilots?
Could any of the PSK31 programmers give thought to makeing a
program for the palm pilot platform? Something akin to Digipan let's
say? I'd like to see it personally. Any thoughts?
73,
Tom - KB2SMS
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:08:23 -0500
From: CAM <W6RCA@mindspring.com>
Subject: PSK31 program for the Palm pilots?
TomR@astro.net wrote:
> Could any of the PSK31 programmers give thought to makeing a
> program for the palm pilot platform?
I don't know much about the palmtops. Do they have sound cards?
Do they have the MIPs to run PSK31?
--
73, de W6RCA
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:27:08 GMT
From: "Larry" <larrywj@home.com>
Subject: PSK31 program for the Palm pilots?
They decode mp3's just fine - so running an fft and a few correlations
shouldn't be any problem. Efficient implementations of PSK31 don't require
much horsepower - look at WinPSK. I think it uses about 4% cpu power on my
desktop machine. Most CE devices have audio input, I'm not sure about the
Pilot though.
Larry - WU8U
CAM wrote in message <394BDAB7.FE938C2E@mindspring.com>...
>TomR@astro.net wrote:
>> Could any of the PSK31 programmers give thought to makeing a
>> program for the palm pilot platform?
>
>I don't know much about the palmtops. Do they have sound cards?
>Do they have the MIPs to run PSK31?
>--
>73, de W6RCA
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:27:28 GMT
From: TomR@astro.net
Subject: PSK31 program for the Palm pilots?
DOH! I forgot, I'm not sure if they can use a soundcard actually.
Maybe this isn't possible after all.....
73,
Tom - KB2SMS
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:08:23 -0500, CAM <W6RCA@mindspring.com> wrote:
>TomR@astro.net wrote:
>> Could any of the PSK31 programmers give thought to makeing a
>> program for the palm pilot platform?
>
>I don't know much about the palmtops. Do they have sound cards?
>Do they have the MIPs to run PSK31?
>--
>73, de W6RCA
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 07:51:54 -0500
From: Seth Miller <sethmiller73@email.com>
Subject: PTC-II and IIe data controllers, and PTC-III to come!
Apparently it doesn't matter, as long as it's free... :-)
- Seth
Pat McKeeby wrote:
> sure you could, but at what bitrate?
> Pat/N0ZO
>
>
> On Sun, 21 May 2000 07:58:08 GMT, hamish@cloud.net.au (Hamish Moffatt
> VK3SB) wrote:
>
> >W6RCecilA <Cecil.A.Moore@ieee.org> wrote:
> >> Friday morning I hooked up with a station from Germany on PACTOR II.
> >> I was running about 20w to a ten meter high dipole on 20m. He was also
> >> running low power to a sub-optimal antenna. Texas to Germany with
> >> 20w and a low dipole - who needs 1kW?
> >
> >You could do the same on Hellschreiber, and no proprietary modems are
> >required (no hardware modem at all, in fact). See
http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/
> >ZL1BPU and I worked on 12m with 0.15W out here, perfect copy. Both using
> >verticals.
> >
> >
> >Hamish
> >--
> >Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:43:35 GMT
From: hamish@cloud.net.au (Hamish Moffatt VK3SB)
Subject: PTC-II and IIe data controllers, and PTC-III to come!
Pat McKeeby <n0zo@lcia.com> wrote:
> sure you could, but at what bitrate?
Why is bit rate important for a keyboard-to-keyboard QSO?
Hellscreiber's speed is fast enough. Sure, I can type much faster
than the symbol rate, but the software has a type ahead buffer.
No big deal.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:17:54 -0400
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: PTC-II and IIe data controllers, and PTC-III to come!
All the various Hell modes are great for keyboard QSO's.
In particular, I really like PSK Hell!! PSKHell is a great weak signal DX
mode.
In my view, PSK Hell is much more sensitive than PSK31 and is much better at
dealing with polar flutter. And since I can't type any faster than the
speed of PSK hell, PSK Hell is perfect for me.
I wish more HAM's experimented with PSK Hell.
I get frustrated with PSK31 since it can't handle polar flutter. I have not
been able to make any QSO's with stations where the path is over the poles.
Of course, since Hell sends characters as images, you really cannot send
binary data.
But each mode has its purpose. In my view, the Hell modes are great for
keyboard QSO's. And the software is FREE!
73s
Rob
"Hamish Moffatt VK3SB" <hamish@cloud.net.au> wrote in message
news:XWU25.8878$DH3.25309@news1.eburwd1.vic.optushome.com.au...
> Pat McKeeby <n0zo@lcia.com> wrote:
> > sure you could, but at what bitrate?
>
> Why is bit rate important for a keyboard-to-keyboard QSO?
>
> Hellscreiber's speed is fast enough. Sure, I can type much faster
> than the symbol rate, but the software has a type ahead buffer.
> No big deal.
>
>
> Hamish
> --
> Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:04:11 GMT
From: TomR@astro.net
Subject: Who's using a Palm pilot for amateur radio?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 22:19:22 -0700, "aa"
<please-reply-2-group-n6vig@hotmail.com> wrote:
>see http://www.pocketaprs.com
Thanks!
Tom
><TomR@astro.net> wrote in message news:394a8531.64899293@news.idsi.net...
>>
>> Hi gang,
>> I'm getting a Palm pilot IIIxe soon and was wondering if any of
>> you folks are using a palm for packet or any other ham radio use. If
>> so, what programs and where can I find them?
>>
>> All replies appreciated!
>>
>> 73,
>> Tom - KB2SMS
>>
>
>
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #169
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
