| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 09.06.00 01:20l 166 Lines 5470 Bytes #-9450 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_159A
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/159A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0CRL<DB0TTM<DB0FP<DB0SRS<DB0SIF<DB0AIS<DB0WST<DB0ACH<
PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8GCB<PI8HGL
Sent: 000608/2004Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:49145 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_159A
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 00 21:20:01 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_159A>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Thu, 8 Jun 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 159
Today's Topics:
Callsign hats
DSP settings for PSK31 (2 msgs)
list of packet sites in Seattle (4 msgs)
MT63 - new version?
PKS31 SIGNAL REPORTS (2 msgs)
wanted desktop receiver
winaprs lite not displaying contacts
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/159
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 13:38:55 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Callsign hats
I got a callsign hat one time at Ham-Comm...
"N5PVL - Like it or not" it says.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:01:18 -0400
From: "Bob Lewis" <aa4pb@erols.com>
Subject: DSP settings for PSK31
> My audio DSP does help quite a bit, especially in crowded
conditions.
> Even though the rig AGC does cut back the rigs gain with a loud
> station, using the DSP lets me turn up the rig volume (to hear the
weak
> station) and then I can filter out the loud station, still copying
the
> weaker one.
>
If you are using what you hear in the speaker as a reference, yes the
external audio DSP should clear up what you hear considerably. The
software however is "looking through" a much narrower window than what
you are listening to and I question why an external audio filter would
help.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:22:27 GMT
From: hamish@cloud.net.au (Hamish Moffatt VK3SB)
Subject: DSP settings for PSK31
Den <dennis.spiess@reckitt.com> wrote:
> My audio DSP does help quite a bit, especially in crowded conditions.
> Even though the rig AGC does cut back the rigs gain with a loud
> station, using the DSP lets me turn up the rig volume (to hear the weak
> station) and then I can filter out the loud station, still copying the
> weaker one.
If both stations are present in the audio spectrum (ie both are heard
after AGC), the software can decode either. All PSK31 software I have
seen includes lots of filtering, so your audio DSP unit won't help.
(It probably won't hurt though.)
> As I can do this in an audio DSP I think it could be done within the
> sound card thus eliminating a piece of equipment. It is not THE
> solution but one I think would help many of us who cannot do anything
> on the rig side. I am looking to see if I can turn off my AGC in the
> rig.
This is already happening.
73
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 14:38:53 GMT
From: R Scott <kf7qz@yahoo.com>
Subject: list of packet sites in Seattle
Ive tried to get into the 106 lan, but wasnt welcome there. The 102 lan
in Everett DIED and none seem in a hurry to allow it back up. Ive
contacted Ken several times and he mentioned someday getting a gateway
back up. But, have heard zilch since.
Rick KF7QZ
Formerly 44.24.102.80
I think I was changed to 44.24.112.80 but I havnt run
it in a while as I just got disgusted with not being
heard and shut it off.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 05:28:11 -0700
From: "Gary P. Fiber" <gfiber@news.cmc.net>
Subject: list of packet sites in Seattle
On Tue, 06 Jun 2000 14:42:13 GMT, "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
wrote:
>That list is several years out of date.
>
>Note the entry for WLINN:W0RLI-1, which went off air nearly three
>years ago when I moved from West Linn to Sherwood. It is now
>PARETB:W0RLI-5 and is on 144.91 here on Parrett Mt.
>
>(Although I'm in Oregon, half my coverage area is in S. Washington state).
I'll mention to the group at wet net, I am a member of that group.
The TCP/IP lans are current though.
gary KF7XV
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 14:01:36 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: list of packet sites in Seattle
"Gary P. Fiber" <gfiber@news.cmc.net> wrote in message
news:0tfsjs8a3c87qdfahnc9smogpf719d9hng@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2000 14:42:13 GMT, "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
> wrote:
>
> >That list is several years out of date.
> >
> >Note the entry for WLINN:W0RLI-1, which went off air nearly three
> >years ago when I moved from West Linn to Sherwood. It is now
> >PARETB:W0RLI-5 and is on 144.91 here on Parrett Mt.
> >
> >(Although I'm in Oregon, half my coverage area is in S. Washington state).
> I'll mention to the group at wet net, I am a member of that group.
> The TCP/IP lans are current though.
>
> gary KF7XV
Running tcp/ip here as well.
It is a bit confusing since 44.116 covers NW Oregon and SW Washington ...
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_159B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
